Some of my well-intentioned friends are asking me to be a little more tolerant towards propagators of energy medicine theories in homeopathy.. Dear friends, have you read the widely propagated recent articles written by people belonging to the class of iris bell, john benneth, dana ullman and the like, who are considered to be international representatives of homeopathy? They use nanoparticles, nanoclusters, nanopharmacology, supramolecular medicine, quantum, molecular imprints and such scientific terms only for the sake of appearing scientific. They represent the energy medicine homeopaths, who hijack scientific concepts into their energy medicine ideas of dynamic drug energy, vital force, radiations, frequencies, resonance, transmissions and such other classical nonsense. Do you think I am criticizing them only due to intolerance? Are you asking me to be tolerant to those people who hijack scientific terms and research outcomes to propagate their totally absurd and unscientific energy medicine theories, who have already done enough damage to the scientific credentials of homeopathy? Without criticizing, exposing and defeating energy medicine influences in homeopathic theoretical system, we cannot make homeopathy scientific, or reasonably interact with scientific community.
Posted on: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:45:55 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015