Steve Anderson is a fraud, he twists things as he needs to make himself look like he knows what he is talking about, when faced with a challenge that requires him to stick to the subject, and answer a specific question, he will prove himself to be clueless, this challenge is directed at him, It will prove that he does not have all of the answers that he claims to have. first of all the evidence shows that the planes penetrated the cores, the obvious piece of evidence is when the top of the south tower fell over just before that tower collapsed, it fell over to the side that was hit by the plane, so when the steel was weakened to the point it could no longer support the above weight it failed and took the path of least resistance (the side where the steel had been destroyed by the impact of the plane) here is the challenge: there are only 2 rules to this challenge 1) stick to the subject and 2) answer the question. in order to destroy a steel framed building with explosive or in cinerary devices, the devices would need to be attached directly to the steel in order to destroy that steel, there are 2 ways to detonate devices, 1) fire and 2) electric, when the planes impacted the towers 3 things happened which all 3 made contact with the steel in the cores, 1) fire from the explosion. 2) static electricity from the friction. and 3) the buildings severed electrical wiring. all 3 did make contact with the core steel. the question for Steve Anderson is; how did anyone manage to set up the towers with explosive or in cinerary devices in such a way that the impacts of the planes wouldnt set those devices off and drop each tower upon each impact. remember that the devices needed to be attached to the same steel as the planes penetrated and made contact with. by the way if you come up with an answer you would be the only one to have. this is probably where I will be blocked by Steve or he will leave this group.
Posted on: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 22:09:10 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015