Synthetic biology as red herring by Beth Preston "Highlights • I argue synthetic biology does not blur the line between artifacts and organisms. • This line has been blurred since domestication and the adoption of agriculture. • Synthetic biology thus represents no ontological innovation over agriculture. • Nor does it represent a cognitive advance over what was required for agriculture. • Synthetic biology represents no significant change in what it is to be human. Abstract It has become commonplace to say that with the advent of technologies like synthetic biology the line between artifacts and living organisms, policed by metaphysicians since antiquity, is beginning to blur. But that line began to blur 10,000 years ago when plants and animals were first domesticated; and has been thoroughly blurred at least since agriculture became the dominant human subsistence pattern many millennia ago. Synthetic biology is ultimately only a late and unexceptional offshoot of this prehistoric development. From this perspective, then, synthetic biology is a red herring, distracting us from more thorough philosophical consideration of the most truly revolutionary human practice—agriculture. In the first section of this paper I will make this case with regard to ontology, arguing that synthetic biology crosses no ontological lines that were not crossed already in the Neolithic. In the second section I will construct a parallel case with regard to cognition, arguing that synthetic biology as biological engineering represents no cognitive advance over what was required for domestication and the new agricultural subsistence pattern it grounds. In the final section I will make the case with regard to human existence, arguing that synthetic biology, even if wildly successful, is not in a position to cause significant existential change in what it is to be human over and above the massive existential change caused by the transition to agriculture. I conclude that a longer historical perspective casts new light on some important issues in philosophy of technology and environmental philosophy. ..." bit.ly/14reACz
Posted on: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 20:28:20 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015