THEISTS ARE INCONSISTENT Theist in argument one: The scientific method is an epistemological process that stems from philosophical naturalism and is based on the idea that a hypothesis is falsifiable and does not apply to the supernatural. He has just seperated God from the physical realm and admits that science cant find God and there is no evidence. Same theist in argument two: Prove to me there is no God. Well according to the logic of scientific discovery you cant prove a negative which the theist already knows. My point is that they admit their is no scientific evidence for God and ask to shift the burden of proof on us forgetting that it contradicts their first argument. This is called sophistry when they change the rules of the argument within an argument. You cant falsify anything that has no evidence of existence. Very simply things which do not have evidence to exist probably do not exist. If as a theist you dont understand that simple atheist position you are clueless. Theist argument three: I know in my heart, I have felt him in my life, I have had answered prayers, I have experienced things. Theists will always give some type of supposed evidence that lacks falsification. Once again trying to posit evidence that contradicts the scientific method and the logic of scientific discovery. Lets just be consistent and admit that there is no evidence for the existence of God whatsoever, neither real or imagined. Stop being sophists. :)
Posted on: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:17:39 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015