Taking the Liberty of Sharing something which few do debate among us and sometimes take things to personal level for no good reason... I was just reading a great Landscaper Marc Adamus who generally doesnt manipulate his images , however he elaborated As were now into the second decade of the new millenium, the debate that started 20 years ago with the introduction of Photoshop - whether or not to use it to manipulate the initial capture is disappearing. The public perception always lags behind the state of the art, but finally most people have come to tolerate and even respect the digital art, realizing that the relationship between reality and photography does not have to die with it.Still, its very unfortunate if completely predictable that there are a few who still cling to the belief that the image that comes strait from the camera is the only real photograph, and everything else is chalked up to manipulation. Those people may not have any comprehension as to the roots of photography - those who knew Ansel well would tell you he would undoubtedly be a Photoshop guru were he alive today. At the very least though, these people have yet to come to grips with one of the fundamentals of history itself that teaches us the inevitable - those who refuse to evolve and embrace new ways become themselves obsolete. No one is ever going to come along and do away with digital post-processing. Its here to stay, so we may as well learn the facts and learn to embrace it as part of the art (Marc Adamus) . Thx for reading. :-)
Posted on: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:03:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015