Tellabs India Private Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) - TopicsExpress



          

Tellabs India Private Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee’s claim that the effect of the assignment of the work of customs clearance and installation by Tellabs Denmark to the assessee is that an independent contract came into existence between the assessee and Power Grid and that as both parties were residents, the transfer pricing provisions cannot apply is not acceptable because it is clear from the various agreements that there has been only an assignment of the portion of an onshore contract by Tellabs Denmark to the assessee and not a novation of the portion of the onshore contract between Tellabs Denmark and PGCIL. The consequences in the event of an assignment and novation are different. Since there has only been an assignment and not novation of the contract in the present case, the transaction of assignment between the assessee and Tellabs Denmark cannot be said to be a transaction between two persons either or both of them were not non-residents. It is a very strange situation because if Tellabs Denmark had not assigned the portion of the onshore contract, the transfer pricing provisions would not have been applicable because Tellabs Denmark and PGCIL are not Associated Enterprises. Though the assignment of the portion of the onshore contract has taken place exactly at the same consideration for which Tellabs Denmark agreed to render services to PGCIL, nevertheless, the assignment agreement between Tellabs Denmark and the assessee has all the ingredients of an international transaction within the meaning of s.92 of the Act. However, the ALP will have to be determined afresh because the international transaction is the assignment between Tellabs Denmark and the assessee and not the agreement between the assessee and PGCIL. The TPO should also consider whether as the assignment of the contract had taken place due to business restructuring and on the same terms as agreed between Tellabs Denmark and PGCIL, it could be said that this transaction itself would constitute a comparable uncontrolled transaction (Swarnandhra IJMII Integrated Township (ITAT Hyd) distinguished).
Posted on: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:46:46 +0000

Trending Topics



rgin-left:0px; min-height:30px;"> STUDENTS OF GREENFIELD PLEASE READ THIS POST!*!*!*! Me, Connor
For any of my Tampa friends who plans to attend todays cookout,go
“Nunca dejes de recordar que sólo el hecho de existir es
Khan Jahan local ruler and celebrated sufi saint. Khan Jahan
Government at work “[T]he court ... issued an order voiding
We had soooo much fun in Liberal at the swimming park!! 🏊 My
06081 Reese Towpower 06081 Class II Insta-Hitch 1-1/4 Square Tube

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015