Thanks Soham for unmasking the actual face of the writer Amitava Gupta because in the caption of his article he has exposed himself.You better could have asked the writer to explain as to why and on what backgound Amartya Sen commented "Modi lacks" Secular Credentials" .If Modi lacks secular credentials due to 2002 Ethnic riot in Gujrat,then why Sen refrained himself from commenting that the ethnic riot which took place before 2002 since 1950 under the Congress rule also lacked"Secular Credentials"Why? Another point,he has cleverly avoided is that he has not mentioned as to the immediate cause that led the Gujrat Riot and who ignited the flame of Gujrat riot.From the entire article it seems that the writer has taken the responsibility to counter the comments of the renowned persons as spokesperson of Amartya Sen and the Congress without any valid data and concrete figures.It shall be better if the Writer goes through the Artile appeared in the Teegraph dated 4th August,2013 at page 11 titled"I WOULD LIKE TO SUE AMARTYA SEN FOR DEFAMATION"and reply the point raised byMadhu Kishwar at Para 15 of her comments either by him or by A.Sen.Before commenting on something on should have sound knowledge on the subject matter he is defending;otherwise his comments would be a laughing stock before the pubic
Posted on: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 03:17:12 +0000