The 60 hours shut-down called by opposition ally: By whom has it been directed? The political field is very rough now. On 25 October the leading party of opposition ally has successfully ended a mammoth combination of people at Suhrawardi Udyan. From which BNP chairperson announced 60 hours shut-down that will be started from 27 october to 29 october 2013. The shut-down was conditional. The condition was if government does not pay heed to the opposition about a conversation. On 26 october the prime minister invited over phone to the opposition leader at Gonobhaban after evening for a conversation. The prime minister also requested BNP chairperson to withdraw the invoked shutdown. The people of Bangladesh thought that “it is going to solve the political tangle.” But they were disappointed when BNP chairperson declined the proposal of a conversation. At present an aesthetic calculation is being carried out. BNP claims that it is the leading party of the opposition ally but I have a doubt about this phenomenon. The demand of the Hartal was a meaningful conversation. Why does BNP not withdraw Hartal after being offered for a conversation by the prime minister? Does not BNP bear the bridle of the opposition ally? If not, who take the leadership of the ally? Is it not Jammat-e- Islami? Of course, it is Jammat-e-Islami who takes the leadership of the opposition ally. I think BNP chairperson was compelled to decline the offer of conversation by Jammat. We saw the reflection of this truth at the procession. Previously, BNP called a procession at Sylhet, but Chatradal was beaten and compelled to go out from the place. From this indication if people think that Jammat is the leading party of the opposition then will they make any mistake?
Posted on: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:17:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015