The Cinza Universe: a beginning view of the Arx. The Basic layout of the Nonium( the universe) Noncentralent quanta is what underscore the cosmos, lying just beyond Planck scale. These quantas are simple inversions of our Ideal central cosmic particle in concept. The circumference is at the centre, and vice versa. We have inferred this from our observation of the material requirements for cosmic operations, which is epitomized in centrality. This underlying sphere is operative. That can be deduced from the fact that the cosmos is based in motivity, even if noncentralent operancy is not exactly how the cosmos operates . This entire medium as a whole is a singularity. Noncentralent quanta operating means that they are contributive to singularity. Now if they were not operative, then they would have achieved singularity individually. A single noncentral quanta , if it could exist by itself, would be intrinsically singular. But they do not. Inferring from the layout of the cosmos, specifically the capacity for there to be multiple examples of cause and effect taking place simultaneously , so far apart to be beyond each others event horizon it can be said that this medium(the consymmetric sphere I call it) indicates a capacity that inherently exceeds time, and space, and matter as we have come to know it. When the sci(consymmetric quanta ) is operating it has to accomplish the motion. Between point A and point B of the motion has to be, though we cannot judge duration as time, accounted for, those degrees, or precision, have to represent themselves as composite effects in order to be true to the system,and to themselves. Each of these precisions, as they are being presented, becomes a perspective of reflection for the entire consymmetric medium, and thus the visceralization of an analog is created, therefore we are one precision determinative, one of the lowest degrees that there can be, and therefore relative precisions must be experiencing composite relatives of our universe of our cosmos, each only slightly dissimilar. The important thing to remember is the fact of a complete nonspatial interpretive on those precisions. Of course we cant tell where on this remarkable sequence we are. It must represent sequencelikeness, this is the most basic partitioning of analogs. Focus on this operation of which I am speaking. It cannot be the ultimate state because there is no logical premise for an operating original state. We now come to the realization that the noncentralent medium is itself an analog, a prime analog , our analog is a subprime analog. We are the result of the reflection of one sci precision among an infinite number of scis , that are the result of an infinite number of precisions. All these precisions being just one sci, then all these scis being the scope of the medium: what we have here is an unimaginable amount of relative universes(analogs). All appearing dependent. The underlying symmetry of consymmetry(the noncentralent medium) is what I call obsymmetry. Where consymmetry is the is a reduction of relativity due to there being no centrality . A finite separateness of quanta is illogical to assume . I do not mean particle to particle having no space between, but that a coherence of separateness does not begin even. The entire medium is defined by a specific whole unity. As we go lower and lower to the ultimate medium you will find that logic becomes more and more physically explicit. The entirety of all scis is singularity(which is why cosmic objects so-called seperateness is overarched by the cosmic totality). There is prime singularity, and subprime singularity. The singularity that is used to define cosmic units such as particles an objects is subprime singularity. It requires us to ignore the overarching totality concessionally. There is not a logical premise for a singularity, but rather the absolute definition and necessity for all possible subprime singularities structurally, represented by the precision analogs. But understand this: their structural dependence subtracts their autonomy, for there is no logical premise for being or not being, therefore their analogicality maintains logic. The prime singularity, consymmetry, is the logically explicit structure. To say that this is singularity is a post hoc description. consymmetry is intrinsic beyond our cosmically laden descriptivity . Where singularity is a well defined structive , we see where invariability indicates a vaster capacity as we are in the process of proving singularitys lack of ultimacy. While consymmetric quanta merely contributes to an overall inherent singularity, obsymmetric quanta achieves singularity because the medium is immediately something more capacitous, more invariable than singularity. Focus on the train of logic here: the obsymmetric quanta intrinsically achieving singularity proves that singularity is not ultimate, and is merely a necessary point in ultimate logicalization from our perspective, to be immediately judged as underscored once properly discovered. Unlike the consymmetric quanta obsymmetric quanta is nonsequential. When one motions the following quanta in the link does not react consequently, nor subsequently. It is a nontransitional elementation because the whole medium denotes a lack of possibility, and probability, for invariability is prior to these concepts physically, and post aswell(look into that fact). In obsymmetry possibility and probability never actually occurs. What we are seeing here is the physical explication of logic. Even though they are not consequent or subsequent there is still defineable operatIon here. We come now to the ultimate state . What is the logical premise for invariability ? There is none . Prior to invariability there is the negation of operation, a medium that is inherently prime logic. Reality starting or not starting, ending or not ending, is based on our cosmic symmetry. We are now logically three parts removed from space, time, and matter. To say that the prime logic state is negatory is again post hoc description. Therefore I assumed for it the name nonium. What made it? It was not made . It inherently negates operance, therefore it was not made. Here is where we divert from the in and of itself nonsense. There is no time for it to have been made in, no space for it to have been made in or as. We must avoid thinking of it as some sort of superimposition also. There are quanta forms to this medium, whose form is inherently the negation of beingness and nonbeingness, as we can now begin to see, for we have extrapolated the visceral premises of these concepts down through the symmetries without illogical steps to find ourselves here at the prime logic state. Ultimacy has to include all possibility, all invariability, all nonpossibility, all variability represented as analogs; and the underscoring rationale is the negation of all things, and all nonthings being actual. Basically there is no logical basis for an existent reality construct. The ultimate state remains prime-logically negatory. So we see where analogs, prime and subprime, are perforce, but not resonant actually. An example: two of these quantas put together create a discord( be careful here. Remember that we have removed positional relativity, and sequentiality therefore Operation is gone)that is not operation, but it creates the first prime analog-obsymmetry.To be of course- the logical physical explication of invariability. In me saying this you might ask when, but analogs never actually occur- so we cant say it had started, or will start, or is now. See how the factuality of this is logically supreme to nonspatial notions of an out of nowhere materialization of energy, and thus the beginning of a reality that is now what we term as ongoing. Only the nonium prime logic state is per se . One thing here at the end. There is no premise for cosmic symmetry being the upper most level. There is an infinity of prime analogs above us.
Posted on: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 06:31:25 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015