The Ferguson police and US federal government conspired to create a No-Fly Zone with the express purpose of keeping the press from exercising its first amendment right to cover the story of the police response to the protests. The US government has and always will treat the black community as a populace to be controlled and conquered. And there are people stupid enough to still buy into the Ferguson polices side of the Michael Brown murder? The U.S. government agreed to a police request to restrict more than 37 square miles of airspace surrounding Ferguson, Missouri, for 12 days in August for safety, but audio recordings show that local authorities privately acknowledged the purpose was to keep away news helicopters during violent street protests. On Aug. 12, the morning after the Federal Aviation Administration imposed the first flight restriction, FAA air traffic managers struggled to redefine the flight ban to let commercial flights operate at nearby Lambert-St. Louis International Airport and police helicopters fly through the area -- but ban others. They finally admitted it really was to keep the media out, said one FAA manager about the St. Louis County Police in a series of recorded telephone conversations obtained by The Associated Press. But they were a little concerned of, obviously, anything else that could be going on. At another point, a manager at the FAAs Kansas City center said police did not care if you ran commercial traffic through this TFR (temporary flight restriction) all day long. They didnt want media in there. FAA procedures for defining a no-fly area did not have an option that would accommodate that. There is really ... no option for a TFR that says, you know, `OK, everybody but the media is OK, he said. The managers then worked out wording they felt would keep news helicopters out of the controlled zone but not impede other air traffic. The conversations contradict claims by the St. Louis County Police Department, which responded to demonstrations following the shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown, that the restriction was solely for safety and had nothing to do with preventing media from witnessing the violence or the police response. Police said at the time, and again as recently as late Friday to the AP, that they requested the flight restriction in response to shots fired at a police helicopter. But police officials confirmed there was no damage to their helicopter and were unable to provide an incident report on the shooting. On the tapes, an FAA manager described the helicopter shooting as unconfirmed rumors. The AP obtained the recordings under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act. They raise serious questions about whether police were trying to suppress aerial images of the demonstrations and the police response by violating the constitutional rights of journalists with tacit assistance by federal officials.
Posted on: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 21:32:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015