The Peaceful Islamic way exposition on unlawful killing. As we continue on in our analysis of Islam, which Muslims claim is peaceful, lets dig deeper into the everyday life of Muhammad, Allahs greatest Apostle: Bukhari Volume 9, Book 83, Number 2: Narrated Ibn Umar: Allahs Apostle said, A faithful believer remains at liberty regarding his religion unless he kills somebody unlawfully. Bukhari Volume 9, Book 83, Number 3: Narrated Abdullah bin Umar: One of the evil deeds with bad consequence from which there is no escape for the one who is involved in it is to kill someone unlawfully. Bukhari Volume 9, Book 83, Number 6: Narrated Abdullah: The Prophet said, NO HUMAN BEING IS KILLED UNJUSTLY, but a part of responsibility for the crime is laid on the first son of Adam who invented the tradition of killing (murdering) on the earth. (It is said that he was Qabil). Laying the blame on Cain doesnt justify Muhammads words for a person to commit the same crime!! What is strange about this information is the fact that while Muhammad does say that it is wrong to kill anyone unlawfully, instead of addressing the person who does the killing, he lays part of the blame upon Cain!! Therefore you can kill people lawfully in Islam and hadith number 6 adds even more support to this because according to Muhammad No human is killed unjustly. Shouldnt he be saying that no human is killed justly? Isnt killing unjust? As one continue to study Islam more you will see examples where killing is just. Well present more down in this paper. Above was more evidence from both the Quran and the authentic traditions about the justified killings in Islam. For those Christians and Jews who are foolish enough to dabble into interfaith prayers and services with Muslims, Im sure you love these examples presented later on in this paper. Bukhari Volume 9, Book 83, Number 5: Narrated Al-Miqdad bin Amr Al-Kindi: An ally of Bani Zuhra who took part in the battle of Badr with the Prophet, that he said, O Allahs Apostle! If I meet an unbeliever and we have a fight, and he strikes my hand with the sword and cuts it off, and then takes refuge from me under a tree, and says, I have surrendered to Allah (i.e. embraced Islam), may I kill him after he has said so? Allahs Apostle said, Do not kill him. Al-Miqdad said, But O Allahs Apostle! He had chopped off one of my hands and he said that after he had cut it off. May I kill him? The Prophet said. Do not kill him for if you kill him, he would be in the position in which you had been before you kill him, and you would be in the position in which he was before he said the sentence. The Prophet also said to Al-Miqdad, If a faithful believer conceals his faith (Islam) from the disbelievers, and then when he declares his Islam, you kill him, (you will be sinful). Remember that you were also concealing your faith (Islam) at Mecca before. Al-Miqdad was very concerned about the prospect of having his hand amputated and not being able to avenge this action. What is strange about the above Hadith is that if youre a Muslim fighter and your opponent dismembers a limb and then claims to accept Islam, he has literally gotten away with his actions!! The problem here is not whether a person should be hurt or killed but the fact that the other non-Muslim can decided to cut off a hand and then escape judgment with a verbal commitment to Islam! What if the person was lying? You would have no way of knowing. Hence, a Muslim fighter could lose a hand or a limb in vain!! A faithful believer, according to Muhammad is allowed to hid their faith from non-believers and then proclaim it once the Muslim populace becomes greater in strength. This is hypocracy because it utilizes outright deceit by the Muslims. It is very easy to hide when youre in the minority and the odds are stacked against you. This practice is still applicable in Muslim followers in the west today. Theyll remain quiet and peaceful because they are a very small majority but the moment they feel that their power begans to grown, soon their voice and demands will too!! Bukhari Volume 9, Book 83, Number 14: Narrated Al-Ahnaf bin Qais: I went to help that man (i.e., Ali), and on the way I met Abu Bakra who asked me, Where are you going? I replied, I am going to help that man. He said, Go back, for I heard Allahs Apostle saying, If two Muslims meet each other with their swords then (both) the killer and the killed one are in the (Hell) Fire. I said, O Allahs Apostle! It is alright for the killer, but what about the killed one? He said, The killed one was eager to kill his opponent. According to the sayings of Muhammad you cant even go and help a fellow Muslim!! Notice that if a Muslim is killed, he would go to Hell along with his killer!!! This gives a new meaning to the term every man for himself. Muhammads way of killing the killer was being killed, hence suicide!! By being killed the killer goes to hell unless the purpose for helping Ali here was to kill him and send him to heaven! If helping the man was leaving him on the battlefield then this wouldnt be very godly would it? No. Either way this hadith furnishes a consistent amount of problems. This is strange indeed. Bukhari Volume 9, Book 83, Number 29: Narrated Salama: We went out with the Prophet to Khaibar. A man (from the companions) said, O Amir! Let us hear some of your Huda (camel-driving songs.) So he sang some of them (i.e. a lyric in harmony with the camels walk). The Prophet said, Who is the driver (of these camels)? They said, Amir. The Prophet said, May Allah bestow His Mercy on him ! The people said, O Allahs Apostle! Would that you let us enjoy his company longer! Then Amir was killed the following morning. The people said, The good deeds of Amir are lost AS HE HAS KILLED HIMSELF. I returned at the time while they were talking about that. I went to the Prophet and said, O Allahs Prophet! Let my father be sacrificed for you! The people claim that Amirs good deeds are lost. The Prophet said, WHOEVER SAYS SO IS A LIAR, FOR AMIR WILL HAVE A DOUBLE REWARD AS HE EXERTED HIMSELF TO OBEY ALLAH AND FOUGHT IN ALLAHS CAUSE. No other way of killing would have granted him greater reward. The only way to reconcile this hadith is to read it carefully. Here Amir killed himself, i.e., committed suicide, and he did this by fighting in Allahs cause. Therefore he is given a double reward for his suicide mission and Muhammad says that there is no reward greater than the actions of Amir!! Sounds frighteningly similar doesnt it? Yes. These Muslim apologist who claim that suicide missions arent condone by Muhammad have done little study on Islam. The terrorist who attacked the World Trade Center in New York felt like they were doing the same thing fighting in Allahs cause. Muslims may say that this wasnt a battle however that isnt the point since Islamic traditions shouldnt condone any type of suicide mission anyway. Wouldnt Muhammad and Allah be wise enough to know that in the future people may misinteprete this? Despite the claims of Muslims, Muhammad did condone suicide missions.
Posted on: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 13:55:45 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015