The Trans-Pacific Partnership Would Undermine Food Safety The - TopicsExpress



          

The Trans-Pacific Partnership Would Undermine Food Safety The TPP would require us to import meat and poultry that do not meet U.S. food safety standards. The TPP would require us to allow food imports if the exporting country claims that their safety regime is equivalent to our own, even if it violates the key principles of our food safety laws. These rules would effectively outsource domestic food inspection to other countries. Under TPP, any U.S. food safety rule on pesticides, labeling or additives that is higher than international standards would be subject to challenge as illegal trade barriers. The U.S. would be required to eliminate these rules and allow in the unsafe food, or we would face trade sanctions. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration already inspects less than 1% of all seafood imports for health hazards. Entering into the TPP with Malaysia and Vietnam, both TPP negotiating parties and major seafood exporters, would increase seafood imports and further overwhelm inspectors limited ability to ensure the safety of our food. Some TPP countries have serious shrimp and fish safety issues. For example, even with the minimal inspections, high levels of contaminants have been found in Vietnams seafood. Under the TPP, food labels could also be challenged as trade barriers. The TPP would impose limits on labels providing information on where a food product comes from. The TPP also would endanger labels identifying genetically modified foods and labels identifying how food was produced. TPP would expand the limits on consumer labels already included in existing trade agreements, like the World Trade Organization (WTO). But already under the WTO, the U.S. dolphin-safe tuna fish label and our country-of-origin meat and poultry labels have been successfully attacked by other countries. And, under TPP, a foreign meat processing or food corporation operating within the United States could directly challenge our policies that they claim undermine their expected future profits - meaning a barrage of new attacks.
Posted on: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 00:40:14 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015