The answer is in this part of USM kanevuniverse pages 198 to 202: The world a round us – is it one reality in the illusion? On the part III p.4 formula 92, we found out the resonance radii about most nuclear particles. We settled also that because of the difference of these radii compare to the basic resonance radii of proton γ_p=1,3233.〖10〗^(-13) [cm] and electron r_e=0,243.〖10〗^(-9) [cm], these particles are unstable and they come to disintegration by the rule of some nuclear reaction diagram, such the final result is some of the stable particles – electron, proton and radiation of certain quantity energy, which take the form of light rays, gamma rays and soon, or through changing of momentum particle. This picture forms the structure of our world nuclear particles. Let now we imagine that some another nuclear particle is stable, for example let accept K^± -meson with resonance radius γ_(K^± )=2,514.〖10〗^(-13) [cm] that it is stable particle. According to formula (89) however, the resonance radii are with exactly definition and reflects the inertial balance of masses in the orbital system on nuclear, or electrostatic level. So to be possible the resonance radius, equal to 2,514.〖10〗^(-13) [cm], which reflecting a stable particle, but not this one of proton - 1,3233.〖10〗^(-13) [cm], it is necessary the velocity of interaction spreading (the light ray on our world) in the formula (89) (γ=h/(c.m)), to take another value, proportionally to the next ratio: γ_p/γ_(K^± ) =(1,3233.〖10〗^(-13))/(2,514.〖10〗^(-13) ),Or: γ_p.c=h/m_p →γ_(K^± ).c_(K^± )=h/m_p ,where: c_(K^± )=c.γ_p/γ_(K^± ) We get a result, which shows us that if the velocity of interaction spreading is equal to: c_(K^± )=γ_p/γ_(K^± ) .c, then the K^± -meson will be a stable particle in the space of nuclear field in our world. Therefore the K^± -meson can examine like a representative of another world, where the spread of interaction, or “light ray” of this another world is moves with velocity c_(K^± ) . From (92) we know that the resonance radii are getting by the ratio between the respectively particles. So: c_(K^± )=γ_p/γ_(K^± ) .c=m_p/m_(K^± ) .c It is obviously that we can define about each nuclear particle with mass m_i “new world”, where the “light” is spreads with velocity: c_i=m_p/m_i .c On the other hand from point 2 about the nuclear particles we know that their masses satisfy the sequence of relatively values (4) – point 1 part III. This sequence reflects the expansion in an infinite series of centripetal acceleration: g=±(v.c)/r.ln(1±v/c) So we obtain sequence of “worlds” with different values of velocity of light, which are describe by the sequence (4), with the expression: c_i=a_p/a_i .c where a_p is efficiency corresponding to the mass of proton m_p. It is seen that in the worlds where the stable particle is more light compare to this one of proton, the velocity of light is bigger and conversely: c_i=m_p/m_i .c So as “more light” are the worlds as much quickly they are. Or at the same time the lighter world envelops bigger space from the matter compare to the heavier one. But if we remind the final of point 4 part III, where we settled that as bigger part from the matter is enveloped, as more time is passes from the “Beginning” of space rising, follows that the lighter world find itself more ahead in the time compare to the heavier world localizing itself on the same space together with the lighter one. Let now we consider that if in some world where the stable particle has mass m_i begins to act process of annihilation with antiparticle having mass (m_i ) ̅ such the result is transformation of whole mass in energy with value E=2m_i c^2, follows that each energy in our world can be examined like a another world, which according to made up above analysis can find itself ahead in the time, i.e. “to know” already what will be happen with our world in the future, or to find itself in the past, such for it our world knows what will be happen with this world in the future. So we can see that practically it is possible to be created “Oracle” if we learn to take communications from the surrounding energy, in which some part can represent another world and if it is lighter in itself is recorded our future. Of course whether indeed such worlds exist for now it isn’t clearly. It is logically however to expect that kind of worlds to exist indeed, because in contrary cause we haven’t explain the privilege place of constant of spread of light among the other real numbers, which creates intuitively sensation for disturbance of symmetry concerning to the possibilities of interaction spreading between the masses with different velocities. We can make up another interestingly conclusion, namely that not always the bigger space contains smaller one, or in other words if some part from the surrounding us energy does represent lighter world, then this world is whole universe composite by subspaces and over-spaces. It is becomes clearly that whole universe from another world can localize in some limited small volume, like a part from our space, for example. Actually the subspaces of our world also do represent whole universe defining itself in limited volume, taken by one atom, for instance. So the idea about envelopment of smaller space by bigger one lost its absolute meaning. This paradox can be avoided only if we are decline from the idea of absolute space, and to accept the space’s distances are nothing else, but the feature of mass to be along some distance each other, provoked by the equality between centripetal and centrifugal forces acting between these masses. For the first time (without discussion) this idea was used on the final of point 4 part III, in order to define the proportionally equality E_0/e_0 =r_0/r and settled the fact about zero value of full energy in the matter. Towards this idea about space we shall return again, but now let we try to answer the next question: What do represent all around us and in ourselves? What is comprehensive essence of the matter? We already made up clearly that the matter is compound by endless sequence from subspaces and over-spaces, composite our world, where the velocity of light has value:c=3.〖10〗^5 [km/s] and more of that – endless number of worlds, which have similarly to our world endless number subspaces and over-spaces, but with velocity of light equal to: c_i=a_p/a_i .c What means to understand the essence of matter? Let accept that it is means that our thought makes up momentarily picture of whole matter, i.e. to passes across the whole matter with endless big velocity. First of all – is it possible something to moves with endless big velocity? The only thing, which can move with such velocity, is our thought, our mental ability, because they do represent something, which haven’t dynamically interaction with the matter. So let we imagine that we pass across the matter with velocity, which increases gradually. Firstly the worlds with smaller values of light velocity (the slowly worlds) will take up velocities, compare to our thought, which is equal to they typically ones and therefore all their masses will transforming in energy equal to E=mc_i^2 So as by bigger velocity we pass across the matter, as more quickly worlds will transform themselves in energy, until finally the endless big velocity will transform the whole matter in energy. But in p. 4 part III we settled that the full energy of matter is equal to zero. Then we can see that the whole matter is transforms in “nothing”. Or the comprehensive matter is “nothing”. How to understand this result? Firstly is it means that the world in its general essence is unknown? There isn’t contradiction, because only the nothing can to be unknown. In our imagination the nothing means that on certain place (and this requires existence of co-ordinates and hence space), there is nothing. To make up comparison it is necessary on some another place with another co-ordinates to exist something, because in contrary cause the concept: “there is nothing” is without sense. Our cause however is not so, because the whole matter transforms itself in nothing and together with it the space as well, and therefore the co-ordinates disappear, because there is no something to be described with these co-ordinates. Therefore the nothing is not infinitesimal point, because the point is place of intersect of two straight lines, and they respectively are cutting lines of two planes, which means that there is space, but this space disappears together with the matter, how we already know. So the nothing like essence of the matter may be is more suitable to call “absolute nothing”. We can say that the world is something like opening of “curtain” in the absolute nothing. Is it means that the world is illusion? Yes, we can say that the world around us is one reality in the illusion. Still there is some unpleasantly sensation that something remains unclearly, something which can explain the illusion essence of world in our reflection. The misconception comes by that we always accept the space like something, which exists independently and absolutely, where ply the processes of matter. If we accept the space and by this the distances like only feature of material bodies reflecting dynamically interconnection, in balance, then the things begins to look in other way. The absolute nothing already has more clearly meaning, because the space like coordinates doesn’t exist and the distances between the bodies as if there they are “pressing” and only centrifugal forces preserve some real values of these distances, which immediately should be transform themselves into zero, if the inter-movement between the material systems disappear, which actually will lead to disappearing of the material systems themselves. This idea of space examination is not new. The Frenchman Descartes (1569 – 1650) has thought approximate in this way: The space is identical with the distances, and the distances are connected with the bodies; therefore there is no empty space. The disadvantage of this idea is that there isn’t eliminate the cause when the distances can to exist without the bodies succeed to form these distances. Exactly this disadvantage in our theory is avoided, because we know that the material bodies create their fields through inertial inter-movement in balance, which defines the distances between them, and the absence of material bodies leads to replacement of distances on the space with the absolute nothing. The obtained result, give us idea about new way for mathematical analysis of matter. If the present mathematics under condition we can call static mathematics like analogy with the static mechanics, then the new section of mathematics we may call dynamical mathematics, or mathematics of belated functions. The definition of these functions can be so that in dynamical variant, they to give like result functions of movement which coincides with the static mathematical analysis plus field part, i.e. potential function describing the properly field of moving system. Besides all mathematical and infinite series which haven’t limits, composed by belated functions, or the same series but composed by sum of belated functions, must to have a limit and this limit must to be equal to absolute nothing, i.e. something similar to limit equal to zero, but not exactly, because in cause of absolute nothing the space absent and the zero cannot examine as a point with certain coordinates. But how we shall estimate all results in mathematical analysis, in the theoretical mechanics and physics at the present moment? Because on the basic of all this is the Cartesian (Descartes) coordinates, which how we saw describes absolute space, which doesn’t exist. Is it means that all results made up in the natural sciences can put under doubt? Certainly the things are no so dramatic, because we always can find three objects on the space which to fixed the tree directions of Cartesian coordinates, but far enough from the beginning of this coordinates, where plays the described physical process, so that three objects to have ignored small dynamically interaction with the objects localizing in the beginning of coordinate. So the describing process is with certain accuracy, such the error can to be defined. Therefore the results obtained by the Descartes coordinates are valid in general, but we always have to remember about the interconnection between the distances and material systems, which form these distances. Finally we shall stop to one special question. The result which we get, namely that the all matter does represent the absolute nothing, so much reminds us about written on the Bible, that the God has created the World from the nothing. The striking nearness of the two assertions creates doubt for us, whether indeed we are the first who settle this truth. Whether there was another civilization before us, which also have known the World secretes? The two assertions are striking close, but still between them is significantly difference as well. If we don’t touch the God, in the expression: “The God creates the World from nothing”, remain the assertion that the World has arisen by some way from the nothing, which actually is not truth. Because we maintain that all matter is identical with the absolute nothing, but not that it has arisen from the absolute nothing. So there is significantly difference as well. G.Kanev
Posted on: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:32:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015