The falsifications and undermining counter-evidence relative to - TopicsExpress



          

The falsifications and undermining counter-evidence relative to DAGW just keeps coming and coming and coming, on and on and on and on,while the MSM, one of our major political parties, Hollywood and the arts community, and K-12 public ed just keep, like the Energizer Bunny, going and going and going and going, clinging to the same intellectually threadbare shibboleths, and banging the same bitter, desperate drum, long after the band itself gave up and went home: wattsupwiththat/2014/03/25/ooops-much-touted-2006-polar-bear-survey-used-by-esa-to-list-them-as-threatened-now-invalidated/ polarbearscience/2014/03/24/southern-beaufort-polar-bear-decline-reduced-cub-survival-touted-in-2008-was-invalid-pbsg-now-admits/#more-4707 It remains utterly fantastic to me how this one, frenzied, single-minded fanaticism has so thoroughly corrupted entire regions of physical and natural science that it may take generations, once the full extent of the intellectual decline in the name of correct scientific findings that will have the correct political implications, is known, to restore public confidence in the scientific community and in the scientific process. We understand how something such as Lysenkoism happened in a closed, state-dominated totalitarian society such as the Soviet Union, but how could such a corruption of empirical science - supposedly self-correcting and immune, for the most part, to the fevers both of democratic politics and of ideological hubris - happen here and in the West, in open societies in which science is free to be done, criticized, and published without hindrance or censorship? Or...is it? Or is anything, anymore, really free from the mediation and/or domination of Big Green Brother?
Posted on: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:32:12 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015