The first section is for Judges They have to uphold the law. A land trust is not an testimentary transaction. A Judge that states Im going to let Mr. X sell the house is being ambiguous. In what capacity? To initial or sign documents for me? Or to be my Closing Attorney against my will? In what capacity? The Judge must also allow a person to be heard that is representing themselves. I specifically stated that the land trust does not go through probate and that we are both beneficiaries with power of direction equally and that the bank would litigate it if it goes through the Court, etc. and he cut me off and said I know that Im doing it anyway. OF COURSE THERE WAS NO COURT REPORTER, Ron wasnt there because he didnt want to get fired for taking so much time off work....he will be there next time though, come hell or high water he stated. So I had no witness, we were the last ones heard and you have to hire your own Court Reporter which most people cannot do, plus he ruled on something that wasnt even in the motion. *notice it wasnt on the Order though* A closing Attorney is appointed by someones choosing. If there is a conflict of interest the Attorney must get a disclosure of consent that the person consents to hiring an Attorney with a conflict of interest. They also must have proof they are your Attorney, a contract. They also can do the Title Companys work for them, dispersing checks AND WITHHOLDING MONEY FOR THEIR FEES, when they go and get a judgement for them in haste. **********this is why I wanted a legal binding document from him and the title company--this is why the title company stated they would do whatever your Attorney instructs us to do....vaguely.****************he is authorized to do things for them if he acts as their agent. I havent found that word for word somewhere yet, but I found it VAGUELY worded in several places.****** I am trying to protect myself. Its also the reason he keeps trying to incorporate the probate matter in with the realty matter. He can also pay the Realty Agent, even if I disagree with them having earned their fees or I didnt sign all the closing papers. I already told this guy I was disagreeing with his fees. I have watched what he has done to accumulate them over the last 2 years and had his client tell me specifically that he had a flat rate fee so I would feel comfortable. Also, initiated and harassed me to obtain an Attorney, so he could state it was VERSUS and a war. It was a response to manipulation by an interested party. Him and the Judge made me feel like I needed an Attorney. And the Chief Judge I might add also recommended it. I simply didnt want to spend money I needed on this matter when there are laws protecting me but not being enforced. And a Judge should enforce them during supervised administration. Its not like I didnt bring it up. Also, I need the funds they are trying to railroad me into spending on an Attorney. For living expenses. And to move with to be by my Grandchildren. This Attorney deliberately got this Judge, who was supposed to be hearing the matter of Substitution of Judges to deliberately rule on a probate matter so that I couldnt substitute him when this Attorney arbitrates his fees. HES AN ARBITRATION JUDGE AND PROBATE. No other Judge should have ruled on a probate matter until the substitution of Judges was ruled on. *THIS WHOLE THING IS SO CORRUPT* Where are the laws to protect people from this? AND I AM SUPPOSED TO RESPECT THE GOVERNMENT THAT DOESNT MAKE THEM? iardc.org/rules_governing_the_legal_profession.pdf
Posted on: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 01:01:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015