The judge wrote: “It is also significant that at least 130 of the newly produced e-mails and attachments were located by using the computer search term project study. From the early stages, COT referred to the El Rio/GCU matter as project study. This was confirmed by Mr. McLaughlin on August 11. Further, on August 11, Mr. McLaughlin acknowledged that: (I) he knew about the project study moniker in May 2013; (2) he has been in charge of COTs response to Ms. Cruzs request from the beginning; (3) he has been the only assistant city attorney working on the El Rio/GCU response; (4) until recently, he has been the only assistant city attorney handling public document requests; and (5) he did not instruct COTs IT department to search using the term project study until after the May 16 Ruling.
Posted on: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:37:29 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015