The judgement from my trial on contempt for those who want to read it, a great attempt by the court not to address the real issues which are too many to mention, but the key points not properly addressed, Superintendent Lacky perjured himself on the stand, Mark Reynolds signed a contract as agent for the bank which means he couldnt be an agent of the mortgagor at the same time meaning he couldnt be a receiver and had no standing and i showed a video of the attempted service where the server hits me in the arm with a piece of paper, the court rules clearly state that when serving, one MUST show the original copy of what has just been served, i just produced a video to show that hadnt been done. I guess court rules only apply to us lol. The biggest flaw was by both senior council and the Judge, I had told them from day 1 that the case had to be proved to criminal standard they both said I was wrong, then on the last day agreed with me but by now it was too late as we had heard evidence to a much less exacting standard.. hmmm
Posted on: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:31:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015