The post notes that by the end of August, Parcells had not only been quoted in numerous media outlets as an authority, he had been erroneously identified as a “forensic pathologist” by CBS, the BBC, the Associated Press, and in at least one article here at The Washington Post. (You can’t be a forensic pathologist without a medical degree.) [...] A climate like this doesnt allow any room to be both skeptical of Parcells’s credibility problems and still troubled by the shooting of Michael Brown. As with the Trayvon Martin story, once the lines have been drawn, nuance is dead. You’re either all-in on all of the talking points, or you’re on the other side. [washingtonpost/news/the-watch/wp/2014/12/02/the-saga-of-shawn-parcells-the-uncredited-forensics-expert-in-the-michael-brown-case/]
Posted on: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:19:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015