The results of this skewed and poorly manipulated study by UC Davis would be laughable if it werent so tragic. Shamlessly bashing such greats as Pitcairn and Billinghurst and stating that their formulas and whole food feeding were detrimental to our dogs is one of the most heinous acts by the Alopathic and greedy veterinary community to date. How did dogs survive for thousands of years BEFORE Purina and Hills (which you see for sale in the photo of Dr. Larson)??? Please read the full article for a chilling wake up call. Susan Thixton is one of my heroes. A fearless watch dog over our pets nutritional health she doesnt care who she has to take on to tell the truth. Wish there were more like her. She has written to Dr. Larson at US Davis and asked; Will you/UC Davis be issuing an apology to all pet food consumers and veterinarians regarding this error? Will you/UC Davis be providing the names of those that reviewed the study (those that also missed the significant Vitamin D error)? Will you/UC Davis be releasing your raw data to this study to verify that other variables used to compare nutrient information of home prepared recipes were as insufficient as your study claimed? (You must realize that this significant error with Vitamin D does bring doubt to everything else in the study and all involved.) Was funding for this now flawed study provided by any of Big Pet Food or their trade associations? Will you be providing full disclosure of who funded this study? But I wouldnt hold my breath for a reply.
Posted on: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:52:10 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015