The sages, the scriptures, the sutras ..all say; you are not the body ..but they only referred to the mistaken notions of the body ..they solely referred to the identification with the imaginary object only..they simply referred to the movement of myriads of impermanent forms/images believed to have a separate autonomous existence ....in actuality, without the true body you are just a thought ~~~ What is the actuality of anything, if not formulated around the continuity of a me. Including the much loved or despised...... bag of bones. And including the mutterings of sages, scriptures and sutras. ~~~ ..it is like when the thought (non-matter) is attempting to describe, to figure out the actuality of living matter. ..no matter what words are being used, they can never capture the Self. ~~ Indeed. For something like living matter or Self........is again nothing more than a mere thought construction. The issue is a non-issue........seen.... ....that in the conveyance by thought..... .... either as an utterance, oral or pixeled...... .......or as an experience..... .....in and as a conveyance by thought......nothing is ever conveyed. And in the absence of thought.....nothing remains un-conveyed. The Self.......un-awared of anything as the Self.. ...has no need to describe. It is un-awared of any need..... .......un-awared of it as itself.... .....un-awared of the quality of being un-awared. ~~~~ ..it would be like thoughts arguing with Silence -- out of which they arise ~~~ Yes. A cul-de-sac. Where the argument is about.....something.... .... a something which got constructed by the very argument. .
Posted on: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 06:02:17 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015