The student of any country are the investment of that nation. The syllabus taught to the student plays important role in the development of mind of the student. But the syllabus taught to the intermediates students is out of mind. It is a great injustice not only with the students but also with national writers that our syllabus contains the lessons of English writers by saying that this increases the thinking power of students Sir! the mind of the students accepts the thing which is related to his/her religion or culture. Take a sight of the book of 2nd year . No lesson in this book leads to our nation or religion. Since many years, a boring novel of James Hilton named as good bye! Mr. chips is being taught to the students which is nothing other then a great problem for the students. Questions are being asked taken from this novel of a whole book and on the basis of that questions it is decided whether the student is able for the admission in university or not. It is a demand or protest of the students to prepare a new course containing The Life Of HOLY PROPHET (P.B.U.H) or some other RELIGIOUS or National material. so the students may easily understand the point. and also it may increase the religious facts. there are some questions for the Government of Pakistan. 1. Does our national writers are not able that their lessons can be added in the course? 2. Why ISLAMIYYAT And Pakstudies just of 50 marks? 3. Why the lessons of Ibnul Haytham, Jabir Ibn hayyan And Dr. Abdul Qadeer khan are not included in the course instead of Alexander Flaming, Louis paster and Robert Christopher? 4. Mustafa Kamal, is not he that person who had banned on the veil of ladies, brought changes in Turkish language and forced to copy the style of English, then why these facts are not discussed in the lesson? If the demands of the students are on fault, then carry on your faulty syllabus. ITS ALL ON YOU...
Posted on: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:42:04 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015