The twins have grown up To claim that Lionel Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo are somehow lacking something as footballers seems almost perverse. These are the twin tornados of todays football landscape, chasing each other in a statistical arms race, tearing up records, making the impossible mundane. But as their third World Cups come around, there remains a sense of incompleteness, of a final summit still to climb. What separates Argentinas Messi and Portugals Ronaldo from footballing immortality? Certainly not goals, whether in quantity or style, or club honours, or individual accolades won. By those measures both match Pele and Maradona, arguably surpass Zinedine Zidane and Johan Cruyff. What it is missing is a World Cup: not a brilliant solo goal, nor a single great win, but a tournament that they have dominated and defined. Diego Maradona achieved that grail in 1986, dancing and driving Argentina to the title. Pele perhaps did it twice, as spearhead in 1958 and embodiment of his teams brilliance 12 years later. Even in defeat Cruyff (1974) and Roberto Baggio (1994) owned a tournament. This is the power of a World Cup. Reputations are transformed. Legacies are gilded. Mexico changed my life, quite literally, says Gary Lineker, whose six goals won him the Golden Boot in 1986. It made a massive difference to me - a player going from one who was not assured of a starting place in the England team to suddenly, after that World Cup, being known by everybody wherever I went. Messi and Ronaldo have achieved far more in club football than Lineker. Between them they have five Champions League trophies and all six of the last Fifa World Player of the Year or Ballon DOr awards. Unlike Lineker they are already global superstars. Yet unlike the former England striker, or his successor as Golden Boot winner, Italys Toto Schillaci, they lack such a clearly defined peak. Deep into their careers, at an age where pace and influence are yet to fade, they will never have a better chance. In 571 minutes at World Cup finals Messi has scored just one goal, the same number as Matthew Upson and Gary Breen. In 754 minutes, Ronaldo has only one more than the England and Ireland centre-halves. To put that into goalscoring context, Denmarks comparatively prosaic forward Jon Dahl Tomasson has five. Pele ended with 12, and the Brazilian Ronaldo had 15. For the true greats of all time, you have got to make a name for yourself at a World Cup, if you are lucky enough to have been born in a country where you can, says Lineker. If you are a great player for a country like Argentina, Italy, Germany or England youve got to prove it at a World Cup - not necessarily to win it, but to make yourself one of the greats of that tournament. It is probably the one thing that counts against Messi at the moment when set against the likes of Pele and Maradona. He has not got that World Cup under his belt - but neither had Maradona until he came to this stage of his career. Maybe Messi will now do the same. In some ways its a cruel yardstick. World Cups, by definition, are only a periodic barometer of greatness. Some of the finest players in history have been denied the opportunity to display at the greatest expo of all, whether through nationality (George Best, Alfredo di Stefano, George Weah), injury and insult (Bernd Schuster) or tragedy (Duncan Edwards, Valentino Mazzola). Others have peaked in intervening years, been dragged down by less liberated team-mates or found themselves neutered by the sort of dedicated on-field attention that the most dangerous opponent routinely attracts. All three could yet happen to Ronaldo and Messi. In the 21st century, there is an argument that the Champions League is a more accurate gauge of a superstars influence: more matches, more sustained pressure, a higher and more consistent calibre of opposition. Messi has three winners medals from European club footballs greatest competition, Ronaldo one each from two clubs. In each triumph, each man played a pivotal role; both have scored key goals in two separate finals. These feats are not achieved by many, let alone the ordinary. And while the Champions League final attracts a far smaller global audience than the World Cup (the 2013 final had an average audience of 150 million, the 2010 World Cup final six times that) its cumulative reach across four years narrows the gap. Then there is over-familiarity that modern media saturation can bring. Very few of us have seen Pele live, whether in person or on television. Even Maradona we know primarily from World Cups and video compilations. You can watch Ronaldo and Messi every week, should you have the right satellite subscription. You can watch them at any moment via video-sharing sites on your mobile and tablet. Has this removed the untouchable aura that surrounds their antecedents? Do we associate Pele with genius because best ofs, by definition, do not include the average or off-form?
Posted on: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:06:23 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015