The word revolution gets used explicitly and without substance in most spaces that are labeled “safe for people of color” or in an atmosphere that is labeled as some kind of connotation to anything that involves the advertisement of social analytical paradigms of “intellect.” To those who are privileged enough at convincing themselves of being “politically” and “consciously” different and moral from the rest. They are the ones who forcefully teach and police what it means to be structurally ethical in these so-called spaces, yet it is their lack of actual practice for what they preach that ignites how the problem always begins. Revolution derives from the Latin verb revolvere, to revolve. That power is never destroyed, it’s never truly manipulated, it is only transferred onto another ideology and image that will eventually begin the cycle of submission all over again. That “man’s” main prolong objective is ruled by destruction and chaos. To assume that revolution is change is to assume that democracy is liberation. I am not at 100 percent every second of my life, in regards to being “moral” or “ethical” concerning my privileges as a man or as some nut in school, because practice is one thing and intellectual masturbatory theories are another. Never have I said that I am a feminist, a reformist, or a revolutionist. Never have I said that I was consciously stable of my actions, in fact - I champion and unmercifully declare that I live by the idiom of “I don’t know.” I make mistakes with a great deal of anger and remorse and I have little to show for at the end of the day. All I believe in is music, food, pleasure, and decay.
Posted on: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 06:07:07 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015