Theories of the Origin of the Universe: If a human has exposure to only one environment, for example only one colour, say white colour of uniform intensity, then a question like ‘where does the white colour come from’ is not going to arise in his mind. Since he does not aware of the existence of another entity which could be used to compare and generate the question, there is no chance of originating such a question in his mind. Suppose, he has exposure to two colours, say red of uniform intensity, rather than only white, then the question definitely arises in his mind, either ‘where does the red colour come on the white’ or ‘where does the white colour come on the red’. Now, arrival of more colours of different intensities along with space and dimensions make situation better for comparison, he could be able to ask more questions through comparison. This is the case of a static situation where no objects are in motion. Now, if the objects are in constant motion, then relativeness takes the role of comparison. If we take two entities, between these two, there are innumerable relations are possible, and it is impossible to interpret all of them by an observer. These relations, on one side, are based on the relative aspects between these two entities, the other side, between these entities and the interpreter. So, one entity can be defined by innumerable ways. This situation of interpretation based on relativeness is different from formal logical interpretations which are based on limited and straight-right relations and deny conflicting relations which may go contrary to the predefined relations. Fundamentally one entity can be defined by innumerable ways and none of these definitions can be considered as absolute. Comparison and relativeness are the two basic aspects in which human understanding is based on.
Posted on: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 02:22:47 +0000