There are three types of pro-capitalists: those who refuse to debate, because were just so obviously dumb and immoral that were only worth trolling; those who debate and end up proving they know not one single solitary thing about economics, history, or how to even form a cogent, self-consistent thought; and those who would die fighting proletarian revolution. They are mutually exclusive categories. The trolls are unquestionably too cowardly to fight a real battle and pose no ideological threat, because they can neither persuade new recruits nor galvanize and retain their current fold. The master debaters either adhere so dogmatically to non-violence that theyd never pick up a gun to begin with or will prove cowardly enough to use their mental gymnastics to excuse themselves from battle. They pose no threat physically or ideologically, as their willingness to debate both reveals the weakness of their positions and opens them up, however marginally, to reason; they are unlikely to actively resist when they realize proletarian revolution benefits them in a tangible way. The only ones who actually pose a threat to the endeavors of anarchists and socialists are those who are willing to contribute to the bourgeoisies violent resistance to revolution, people who find honor in service to the state rather than paranoid woodsmen. In other words, police and soldiers and those who admire those occupations. What Im saying that its loads of fun to cut our ideological teeth on the debating pro-caps, and its no major inconvenience to block those whose only goal is getting those sweet, sweet asspats from other pro-caps. But eventually the time is going to come when we need to know how to resist violent oppression and overcome state repression.
Posted on: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 07:45:03 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015