There will never be such a thing as non-violence resistance. What may be non-violent to the perpetratot will surely be violent to the victim. The so called non-violent resistance is a way of undermining the urgency of the victims. Every resistance is and must be violent either to the perpetrator or to the victim yet in this so called non-violent resistance its always a case of being violent to the victim. Just look at the case of the Boko Haram there we have young girls who are kept hostage, raped maybe killed yet we busy writing on facebook and twitter #bring-back-our-girls this wont change a thing rather than to allow Boko Haram to continue their brutality. Martin Luther King Jr is much more celebrated than Malcolm X but should we say that Malcolm was less influential and instrumental in resistance? It is the case for Nelson (the popeye) is more celebrated than Chris Hani, was Hani less instrumental?
Posted on: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:35:31 +0000