These three dishonorable judges, William Layden Junior, Thomas - TopicsExpress



          

These three dishonorable judges, William Layden Junior, Thomas Bartheld, and James Pratt. DA Rob Barris, ADA Craig Rittenhouse, who was suppose to be the prosecuter sided with the defense. ADA Greg Stidham also involved in covering up and tampered with state witnesses and evidence. In This case could, and did, cheat. Opposing counsels, Reheard, and Barnes could, and did cheat. And once they coordinated their cheating, no fact, law or procedure could save the victims. They were set up to lose and were denied justice .When you think of a “corrupt” judge, they traded rulings for cash. You must appreciate however, that corruption may take subtle but equally destructive forms.Among other things, a dishonest judge can ignore evidence, twist rules and procedure, obstruct the record, retaliate, manufacture facts or ignore others, allow infirm claims or dismiss valid ones, deny admission of evidence prejudicial to the favored party, suborn perjury, mischaracterize pleadings, engage in ex parte communication and misapply the law.When he or she does these things intentionally, (motivation is a separate issue) he commits a crime. Petty or grand, the acts are still crimes. It takes surprisingly little to “steer” a case.After the American Revolution, our Constitution was conceived and adopted as the mechanical foundation of our government. For ordinary citizens, the independent grand jury was the only tool of salvation from judicial corruption. Without this critical tool of redress, American civil rights exist only at the will of a judge. That tool (unfettered access to a grand jury) has been taken away.Judges simply snatched it from us. They did it by enacting “judicial legislation,” i.e., by “ruling” that private citizens had no right of access to the grand jury. They took the grand jury from us and they gave it to themselves, and they use their gatekeeping power to protect themselves (from accountability) all the time.Who decided, “What will be the law?” Judges did.Who is supposed to decide, “What will be the law?” Congress is.Right under Congresss nose, the entire judicial branch of our government placed itself out of reach. They eliminated all means to be held accountable to the public for their actions.Judges are now, above the law.Federal judges and federal prosecutors routinely block the access common citizens are supposed to have to the federal grand jury.There is a logical but not legal, reason for this
Posted on: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 02:35:07 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015