This article clearly states that a nurse and a Dr said the child was injured and had bruising and swelling....the article also states that there was zero evidence of tampering with the photo per their investigators and Aaron posted the photo first not Davida....how in the hell could they possibly convict her of anything? I just dont understand unless there is some other evidence that the public is unaware of how a conviction was possible.
Posted on: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 04:18:24 +0000