This is Bertinis take on the recent denial of his petition. DIs attorney (trademark attorney), 3 judges and now the Director have all explained the law to him and this petition denial is just a rehash of what the others have said. But Bertini thinks he is still right. My question is this: Why didnt W&S/EFF who are experienced TM lawyers ever allege/accuse DI of fraud with respect to the UHing mark? A clue: Because they know better! And there is no fraud so you cant prove what doesnt exist! !
Posted on: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:40:40 +0000