This is a lot to read, but it is worth u and YOUR CHILDRENS HEALTH! Ill regurgitate this into a smaller article, as soon as I can get permissioN! PLEASE READ!! xoxoox SOVEREIGN LIVING | 10.11.2014 22 Brands to Stop Buying NOW By John Ross Crooks Dear Ken, The top 10 U.S. food companies are greedy. They will do anything to keep the dollars pouring in — including skimping on food quality. And it’s jeopardizing your health. Lately, these companies have been feeling some pressure. They can sense control slipping through their fingers bit by bit. They are, however, the world’s largest for a reason: They have the financial backing and marketing resources to fight back ... and win. And thats exactly what theyre doing. While it is a daunting battle for consumers, we shouldn’t throw up our hands in surrender. Taking a stand is the only way to force a change. This means eating responsible food produced by companies that haven’t sold out to the giants in the food and agriculture industry. It also means figuring out the companies to steer clear of … Seriously, They Scored 30%?! There is a website called Behind the Brands that rates the major food companies that control the brands you come across every day. The organization investigates seven facets of a company’s supply-chain practices, including sustainability, environmental impacts and workers’ rights. Surprise! Six out of the world’s top 10 largest food and beverage companies scored “poor” overall. General Mills, known mostly for cereals as well as its Betty Crocker and Green Giant brands, comes out on bottom having earned only 30% of the total possible points. It scored “poor” in land sustainability, worker rights, transparency — pretty much everything except climate and water sustainability, where it is noted to be “making progress” (aka feigning climate advocacy and transparency about water usage). But that hasn’t stopped the company from trying to save its public image. Recently, the food giant has been on a mission to manage consumer and investor perceptions. In the last 15 years, General Mills has gobbled up natural- and organic-minded companies, including Food Should Taste Good, Larabar and Cascadian Farms. It’s General Mills’ preferred diet to get a healthier image. And last month they announced their purchase of Annie’s Homegrown, a socially responsible company that uses natural and organic ingredients. Shortly after that announcement, I sat in on a discussion at the Natural Health Expo in Baltimore where an Annie’s representative was speaking on natural food and sustainability. It was a thorough presentation that revealed why Annie’s is an excellent company that offers quality food. General Mills saw that, and General Mills decided to take that. What better way to improve its dismal social-consciousness rating? The problem here is that Annie’s doesn’t quite follow the General Mills philosophy. Annie’s actually advocated for mandatory labeling of genetically modified food (GMO). That’s at odds with General Mills, which unleashed $2 million to fight against the very same state-based labeling initiatives Annie’s supports. General Mills says it’s because it prefers a national standard on labeling, instead of individual states enforcing labels (more on that charade in a minute). This begs the question: With General Mill’s as the parent company, will Annie’s be forced to assimilate? Will we lose another socially-responsible company to a food giant with deep pockets? The answer is simple: Yes. Their Cunning Hypocrisy is Scary The food-company giants are established on cheap and abundant food that is irresponsible, unhealthy — or both. They cannot abandon that model. If they do, they abandon their profits and global influence. The best they can do for their image is to eat up smaller food companies that are doing things right, including the companies that conscious consumers have sought out for years. Now, there are some people who think there is nothing wrong with patronizing responsible brands that have been gobbled up by the big boys ... so long as they are eating healthy foods. They’re wrong. The quality of sell-out brands will falter, like when General Mills tripled the sugar content in Cascadian Farms cereals, a company that once claimed “no added sugars.” Or when Dean purchased WhiteWave Foods, which then stopped using organic soybeans in its Silk soy-milk products. Beyond its direct acquisitions, the food giants will also eliminate any remaining responsible brands through regulatory proposals, marketing blitzes or backroom lobbying deals. The result will be some combination of fewer, costlier and less responsible choices. For example, consider the face-off over labeling GMOs. Big companies, including Pepsi, General Mills and the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), have battled hard against state-based initiatives that would mandate labeling GMOs. While I’m not one for government mandates, that still makes me raise an eyebrow. And it doesn’t stop there. The president and CEO of the GMA, Pamela Bailey, teamed up with the U.S. government and the World Bank to develop the world’s first Global Food Safety Fund. Their mission is to force the world to have “international model standards and practices in food safety management from production to consumption.” I don’t know about you, but that makes me nervous. Actually, if I’m honest, that terrifies me. As I’ve written before: Regulations mean quality takes a swift nose-dive. Bailey also spearheaded the creation of the Coalition for Safe Affordable Food (CSAF). The group is made up of 37 industry heavy weights that want to rob states of the ability to pass GMO labeling legislation. It claims it wants to: “Affirm the FDA as the nation’s authority for the use and labeling of genetically modified food ingredients.” In other words: They want to put GMO oversight squarely in the hands of the FDA. Sure, because the government always makes such great decisions. The CSAF has also decided the definition of “natural” needs federal approval. They want the FDA to define the term “so that food and beverage companies and consumers have a consistent legal framework that will guide food labels and inform consumer choice.” In other words: They want a bureaucracy to define the term “natural” legally rather than with common sense. What could possibly go wrong? And that’s not even the most upsetting one. The group has also stated that it wants the FDA to “establish federal standards for companies that want to voluntarily label their product for the absence-of or presence-of GMO food ingredients …” In other words: They want a regulatory penalty for companies that voluntarily use GMO labels. That tells me all I need to know about the CSAF’s intentions. They would create a disincentive for food companies to keep their customers informed. Somehow, discouraging GMO labeling will help “consumers clearly understand their choices.” What a load of you-know-what. Basically, industry heavyweights recognize their own vulnerability in the natural, organic, non-GMO space. And they don’t like it. So they are eliminating the competition by either swallowing smaller companies or increasing the price smaller companies must pay just to stay in the game. But there’s a simple solution to this. We just have to find and support alternatives to these food giants before there aren’t any left. Avoid These 22 Brands Eat real food. Eat quality food. Eat food that hasn’t sold out to the food, agriculture and chemical industries. While it’s easy to avoid the top 10 food company brands, it’s harder to avoid sell-outs. So I created a list that can help you. In the picture to the right, you can see the 22 common brands that have sold out, and have ceded market share back to the power players. If you’d like to see a larger image, just click here. It includes brands like Naked Juice, Quaker, Horizon Organic dairy products, Kashi and Nature Valley. Take a look and make the choice to find the alternatives before that choice is taken away. To quality living, JR Crooks Editor, Sovereign Living Privacy Policy The Sovereign Society’s Sovereign Living| 55 NE 5th Avenue, Suite 200 | Delray Beach, FL 33483 The mailbox associated with this email address is not monitored, so please do not reply. Your feedback is very important to us so if you would like to contact us with a question or comment, please click here: click.sovliving/t/Cg/AAEDxw/AAEb6A/cnY/AAGz9g/Mjc1MTgyfGh0dHA6Ly9jbGljay5zb3ZlcmVpZ25zb2NpZXR5LmNvbS90L0NnL25XNC9yVVkvRGxjL0FBSjlrUS9NVGczTlRjNGZHaDBkSEE2THk5MGFHVnpiM1psY21WcFoyNXBiblpsYzNSdmNpNWpiMjB2Li9BUS9DbFFR./AQ/zv5x Legal Notice: This work is based on what weve learned as financial journalists. It may contain errors and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Therefore, you should not base investment decisions solely on what you read here. Its your money and your responsibility. Certain investments such as futures, options, and currency trading carry large potential rewards but also large potential risk. Dont trade in these markets with money you cant afford to lose. CFTC Rule 4.41 - These results are based on simulated or hypothetical performance results that have certain inherent limitations. Unlike the results shown in an actual performance record, these results do not represent actual trading and may have under-or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated or hypothetical trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. Past results of any individual or trading strategy published by the Sovereign Society are not indicative of future returns by that individual or strategy, and are not indicative of future returns which could be realized by you. (c) 2014 Sovereign Offshore Services LLC expressly forbids its writers from having a financial interest in their own securities or commodities recommendations to readers. Such recommendations may be traded, however, by other editors, Sovereign Offshore Services LLC, its affiliated entities, employees, and agents, but only after waiting 24 hours after an internet broad cast or 72 hours after a publication only circulated through the mail. Remove your email from this list: click here Reply, Reply All or Forward | More
Posted on: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 01:12:35 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015