This is a private message to Mark Zuckerberg. Hi Mark, I am completely sure you are aware that you have people under your direct responsibility cooperating with agents of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. They are currently trying their best to make sure that my message gets very little widespread exposure. The reason is that they have failed to prove to me the foundational lawful power through which they derive their lawful authority. Between you and me we can both see very clearly that there is some rather unsavory business afoot. You might be like I was where you might think you know how they get their power. I thought I knew but some odd things happened to me that caused me to question my base assumptions and research the law. After 12 years and contacting many people in government and law, no one was able to answer my question in any meaningful way. So I noticed through lawful presentment all those on every level of government through YouTube and through written lawful presentment all agents between me and her Majesty the Queen of England and Pope Benedict to see if they could concretely prove by what lawful authority they derive their power. I know they all got the message as hundreds of my friends called their offices and made sure the knew my video notice was received. I know they got it as agents from the FBI, US Treasury and Federal Attorneys confirmed it to me directly. Now because I asked in good faith and I was courteous about it then there was no reason for them to refuse to answer. Except either they dont know, they refuse to tell me or they do not have the lawful authority. In the first case then if they are ignorant and I am not then they are incompetent and therefore, I, as a competent man have a lawful duty to take care of them. In that case because Facebook itself is a corporate entity created, presumably, under their authority then all your activities are for me to approve as you would render yourself incompetent merely by placing yourself under their incompetent responsibility and authority. In the second and third case. One who has lawful authority would have no trouble substantively providing evidence to that fact. If they refused then they all fall under the most uncomfortable category. That is: they do not act under any lawful authority and are therefore criminals. I am sure this must be a simple misunderstanding on your part. Could you please clarify if you are incompetent and therefore fall under my authority or are you simply ignorant of the law and unable to comprehend the depth of your crime? Your help in this matter would be most appreciated. In the meantime could you please tell your staff that infringing on my use of this public record in any way whatsoever is witness tampering and an obstruction of justice? You see, very soon, my message is going to get out and I would not want you inadvertently finding yourself on the wrong side of the law. I will ask you the same question. Can you prove by what lawful authority agents of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA actually have the power they claim to have? I will assure you it is not by consent, not by lawful social contract and as you probable have guessed in reading this, that not all people are universally ignorant of the law and incompetent. I do so enjoy this, so very, very much and look forward in great eagerness to your clarification of this matter. Sincerely, Roage
Posted on: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:11:02 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015