This is an Official complaint: 03/28/2013 Before all courts, I - TopicsExpress



          

This is an Official complaint: 03/28/2013 Before all courts, I declare that this is not just ripe; it is rotting the core of this nation of Free People this affront has been felt by the majority of the members of this society. I Thomas D. Jones US citizen; while standing guard duty over the foundation stones of our union; Declare that they have been attacked by enemies of obedience to our constitution and hereby give witness of insurrection against Union through a confounding of and total disregard for the legal laws of this Land. Enemies of obedience to our constitution have in open defiance and force of armed rebellion, warred, against the US constitution; They have done unto American citizens, what our constitution says no state shall do, They have enforced and or made; a law that abridges a legally enumerated liberty of American citizens and are using force of arms both to strip American citizens of the presumption of innocence and to abridge the privileges granted by the sovereignty of the US constitution. As Shepherd Thomas I do hereby bring rebuke against the current powers that be. US constitution Article 14 Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. I claim that a great number of the citizens of Heaven living within the boundaries that the People of the United States have drawn in the sands of time and claimed as their own; are being mistreated by acts of rebellion against the legal form of government that the Kingdom of Heaven helped set up for them. People wanting to be free from the controls of government asked the King of Heaven for a way. The United States was instituted with sovereign spheres of action. With the sovereign sphere belonging to an agreement between conventions of the people in each if their several states; to be outside the control of the other spheres of action granted the limited power to needed to run the society; safely for all members equally; Sovereign above ALL the spheres granted by joining the portions of sovereignty that each member of society grants to the collective rule. Every thing that the people can freely do while going about their liberties was legally placed within it. free people were allowed privacy and the legal authority to claim portions of land as their own; that too was put into the Peoples Sphere of Action [PSofA] that too is sovereign to the federal voice of the PSofA by due process of law. Speaking in the terms used in serving the production of earthly possessions; In these United States; The People are the employers of public servants & servants cannot take the property of their employers by force without being guilty of stealing.. I stand guard and defend the proposition that the members of the first Supreme Court in these United States knew what they were doing when they cited for their authority in the legal foundations of their newly formed society. Moreover, I do hereby bring to you remembrance of them. I do hereby claim the following to be truths; “If any one proposition could command the universal assent of mankind, we might expect it would be this-that the government of the Union, though limited in its powers, is supreme within its sphere of action”. 17 U.S. 316 (Wheat.) MCULLOCH v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al. February Term, 1819 March 7th, 1819. MARSHALL, Ch. J., delivered the opinion of the court. The people also have a 10th amendment sovereign sphere of action [PSofA] within which they are supreme; US Constitution Amendment X “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The PSofA has a sovereign legal voice; US Constitution Article. V. The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; “Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing; and as they retain every thing they have no need of particular reservations. WE, THE PEOPLE of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ORDAIN and ESTABLISH this Constitution for the United States of America. Here is a better recognition of popular rights, than volumes of those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our State bills of rights, and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics than in a constitution of government.” Hamilton ff#84 From the Supreme Court citations claiming John Locke’s second treatise on government as an authority on the fundamental principles of our legal form of government; “where an appeal to the law, and constituted judges, lies open, but the remedy is denied by a manifest perverting of justice, and a barefaced wresting of the laws to protect or indemnify the violence or injuries of some men, or party of men, there it is hard to imagine any thing but a state of war: for wherever violence is used, and injury done, though by hands appointed to administer justice, it is still violence and injury, however coloured with the name, pretences, or forms of law, the end whereof being to protect and redress the innocent, by an unbiassed application of it, to all who are under it; wherever that is not bona fide done, war is made upon the sufferers, who having no appeal on earth to right them, they are left to the only remedy in such cases, an appeal to heaven.” [Locke sect. 20…“Sect. 222]. The reason why men enter into society, is the preservation of their property; and the end why they chuse and authorize a legislative, is, that there may be laws made, and rules set, as guards and fences to the properties of all the members of the society, to limit the power, and moderate the dominion, of every part and member of the society: for since it can never be supposed to be the will of the society, that the legislative should have a power to destroy that which every one designs to secure, by entering into society, and for which the people submitted themselves to legislators of their own making; whenever the legislators endeavour to take away, and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to the common refuge, which God hath provided for all men, against force and violence. Whensoever therefore the legislative shall transgress this fundamental rule of society; and either by ambition, fear, folly or corruption, endeavour to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other, an absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of the people; by this breach of trust they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the people, who. have a right to resume their original liberty, and, by the establishment of a new legislative, (such as they shall think fit) provide for their own safety and security, which is the end for which they are in society. What I have said here, concerning the legislative in general, holds true also concerning the supreme executor, who having a double trust put in him, both to have a part in the legislative, and the supreme execution of the law, acts against both, when he goes about to set up his own arbitrary will as the law of the society. He acts also contrary to his trust, when he either employs the force, treasure, and offices of the society, to corrupt the representatives, and gain them to his purposes; or openly preengages the electors, and prescribes to their choice, such, whom he has, by sollicitations, threats, promises, or otherwise, won to his designs; and employs them to bring in such, who have promised before-hand what to vote, and what to enact. Thus to regulate candidates and electors, and new-model the ways of election, what is it but to cut up the government by the roots, and poison the very fountain of public security? for the people having reserved to themselves the choice of their representatives, as the fence to their properties, could do it for no other end, but that they might always be freely chosen, and so chosen, freely act, and advise, as the necessity of the common-wealth, and the public good should, upon examination, and mature debate, be judged to require. This, those who give their votes before they hear the debate, and have weighed the reasons on all sides, are not capable of doing. To prepare such an assembly as this, and endeavour to set up the declared abettors of his own will, for the true representatives of the people, and the law-makers of the society, is certainly as great a breach of trust, and as perfect a declaration of a design to subvert the government, as is possible to be met with. To which, if one shall add rewards and punishments visibly employed to the same end, and all the arts of perverted law made use of, to take off and destroy all that stand in the way of such a design, and will not comply and consent to betray the liberties of their country, it will be past doubt what is doing. What power they ought to have in the society, who thus employ it contrary to the trust went along with it in its first institution, is easy to determine; and one cannot but see, that he, who has once attempted any such thing as this, cannot any longer be trusted.”. “But it will not follow from this doctrine that acts of the large society which are NOT PURSUANT to its constitutional powers, but which are invasions of the residuary authorities of the smaller societies, will become the supreme law of the land. These will be merely acts of usurpation, and will deserve to be treated as such.” Hamilton ff#33 If invasions of the smaller spheres of action are, thefts then so are invasions of the PSofA I know full well, that the fundamental principles of our legal form of government; only matter to men who have not sold their Honor to the worship of earthly possessions. So Personally, I do not view people who steal from their employers as having any type of honor for they are “Lawless men”. I also claim that the courts have rebelled against obedience to their duty to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves instead of to our servants for; “It is not otherwise to be supposed, that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their WILL to that of their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose, that the courts were designed to be an intermediate body between the people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the latter within the limits assigned to their authority.” Hamilton FF#79 Was not the definition of Enemy Combatant in our war against Americans being terrorized by governments; specifically worded to include people levied by criminal governments to use force of arms, against American citizens? That cannot exclude people levied by the domestic enemies of obedience to our own constitution to aid in their usurpations of authorities and rebellions against the blessings of liberty being the sovereign 10th amendment property of free people. I also claim that the lack of respect shown to the sovereignty of the PSofA; By the Peoples servants in the other spheres of action granted by our constitution; Calls into question, the legality of the power granted to all the sovereign spheres of action. I plead to any/all court/s for justice and ask the courts for damages, in the following manner; 1 the perpetrators brought before justice; [The people who actually wielded the power of government into the Peoples federal sphere of action and actually took; the legal possessions of free people without asking; therefore by force]. As I speak also for the Kingdom of Heaven, I seek forgiveness for all; I ask for a public acceptance of the sovereignty of the PSofA. A good show of apology; for all of the prior armed invasions. Then, for the current powers that be to remove all their legislated acts of insurrection that have to date; been mixed in with the legal laws of this land, so that decent men giving aid to those who govern stop becoming traitors and enemy combatants when trying to enforce the peace. I would also suggest that it might be prudent for the person who now governs Each state for the People to ask the President to issue pardons for all of the citizens who have given aid or comfort to domestic enemies of obedience to our constitution; in these Legislated acts of war against America’s legal form of government. The Liberties of free peoples are not privileges that servants can take without asking. Our Forefathers did not hang the rights of free people; on the whims of the few! I do not bear false witness; Sincerely Shepherd Thomas Jones esq. Defender of building foundations on a rock that Free People cannot allow to be undermined
Posted on: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 17:09:53 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015