This is provision of section 188 of the 1999 constitution as amended that some misguided elements are hoping to be misinterpreted and bring back the impeached Deputy Gov., Sani Contact! Sani has no case because there is no aspect of the constitution that says House business shoot stop because of any vacancy as those elements are contending, secondly no aspect of the constitution restrain the an Acting Chief Judge from performing the function of the Chief Judge Section 188 of the 1999 Constitution- (1) The Governor or Deputy Governor of a State may be removed from office in accordance with the provisions of this section. (2) Whenever a notice of any allegation in writing signed by not less than one third of the members of the House of Assembly- (a) is presented to the Speaker of the House of Assembly of the State; (b) stating that the holder of such office is guilty of gross misconduct in the performance of the functions of his office, detailed particulars of which shall be specified, the Speaker of the House of Assembly shall, within seven days of the receipt of the notice, cause a copy of the notice to be served on the holder of the office and on each member of the House of Assembly, and shall also cause any statement made in reply to the allegation by the holder of the office, to be served on each member of the House of Assembly. (3) Within fourteen days of the presentation of the notice to the Speaker of the House of Assembly (whether or not any statement was made by the holder of the office in reply to the allegation contained in the notice), the House of Assembly shall resolve by motion, without any debate, whether or not the allegation shall be investigated. (4) A motion of the House of Assembly that the allegation be investigated shall not be declared as having been passed unless it is supported by the votes of not less than two-thirds majority of all the members of the House of Assembly. (5) Within seven days of the passing of a motion under the foregoing provisions of this section, the Chief Judge of the State shall at the request of the Speaker of the House of Assembly appoint a panel of seven persons who in his opinion are of unquestionable integrity, not being members of any public service, legislative House or political party, to investigate the allegation as provided in this section. (6) The holder of an office whose conduct is being investigated under this section shall have the right to defend himself in person or be represented before the panel by a legal practitioner of his own choice. (7) A panel appointed under this section shall- (a) have such powers and exercise its functions in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed by the House of Assembly; and (b) within three months of its appointment, report its findings to the House of Assembly. (8) Where the panel reports to the House of Assembly that the allegation has not been proved, no further proceedings shall be taken in respect of the matter. (9) Where the report of the panel is that the allegation against the holder of the office has been proved, then within fourteen days of the receipt of the report, the House of Assembly shall consider the report, and ifby a resolution of the House of Assembly, supported by not less than two-thirds majority of all its members, the report of the panel is adopted, then the holder of the office shall stand removed from office as from the date of the adoption of the report.
Posted on: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 20:23:03 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015