This is what Mitch McConnell just said in defense of his decision to whip up Republicans to kill a bill that would have reigned in NSA spying and phone-tapping: “That’s part of the reason why I’m so strongly opposed to the legislation offered by the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee that would end one of our nation’s critical capabilities to gather significant intelligence on terrorist threats. “This is the worst possible time to be tying our hands behind our backs. The threat from ISIL is real. It’s different from what we’ve faced before. And if we’re going to overcome it — if our aim is to degrade and destroy ISIL, as the President has said — then that’s going to require smart policies and firm determination. “At a minimum, we shouldn’t be doing anything to make the situation worse. “Yet, that’s just what this bill would do. “Most damagingly, it would hinder the ability of intelligence community analysts to query a database to determine links between potential terrorists. Instead, the Leahy bill would have this data be held by telephone companies, and it would make it far harder for records to be gathered for a specific selection term. Under the Leahy bill, the telephone companies would face no statutory requirement to even hold the relevant data. “There is a legitimate debate to be had over the proper balances to strike in our democracy. We continue to have it. We should. “But the opponents of this collection program have not provided any examples of the National Security Agency intentionally spying on innocent civilians. In fact the NSA, the courts and the Congress have put in place detailed oversight procedures to protect both privacy and national security. “Moreover, the only data captured under this program is the telephone number dialed, the number from which the call was made and the length of the call. Under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, the content of the call is not captured. “So I think the programs we have in place strike an appropriate balance between protecting our civil liberties and keeping our nation safe. And I think the bill before us would upend that delicate balance completely. “What’s more, legislation with such far-reaching effects should be given the closest possible scrutiny. But this bill was never even considered by the Judiciary Committee or the Intelligence Committee. So it’s unclear why the Majority Leader is moving to it now, rather than taking up a bipartisan measure like the FISA Improvements Act that passed the Intelligence Committee on a strong bipartisan vote of 11-4. “And with the current law not expiring until June, it’s unclear why the Majority Leader wants to rush this untested bill through in a lame duck session rather than after reasonable consideration by relevant committees and by the newly elected Members who will actually be responsible for overseeing the program’s operation. “The point is, the authorities we enacted after September 11, 2001 — which were crafted to ensure that we integrated intelligence gathered overseas and here in the United States — are acutely relevant now. We live in a dangerous world. Threats like ISIL only make it more so. “And at a moment when the United States is conducting a military campaign to disrupt, dismantle and defeat ISIL, now is not the time to be considering legislation that takes away the exact tools we need to combat ISIL. “Our intelligence community is working to track foreign fighters returning from fighting in Syria, to prevent others from travelling to the battlefield, and to keep those within Syria from radicalizing their friends and family back home. “It makes little sense to pass legislation that hinders our intelligence community — legislation that has yet to receive any committee consideration. “On that note, today’s Wall Street Journal features an excellent opinion piece authored by former Federal Judge and Attorney General Michael Mukasey and General Michael Hayden, the former Director of the CIA and NSA. I recommend their column, ‘NSA Reform That Only ISIS Could Love,’ and I request that a copy of it be placed in the record at the end of my remarks.
Posted on: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:28:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015