This is why the military powers in the Arab world will never intervene. Its purpose is not to defend the Arab or Muslim people: Why then, does the Arab League demand that the UN (i.e the West) intervene when it is perfectly capable of deploying soldiers and personnel who could provide humanitarian and military assistance to those in need? Why did the Arab League allow NATO to lead the anti-Gaddafi coalition when on the one hand, many League members rejected outside intervention and while Morocco, Jordan and Gulf states could have done it themselves? That is, if they wanted to do so. The real issue is that, for most Arab League nations, a strong military has primarily guaranteed that the ruling strongman will maintain power. huffingtonpost/michael-sharnoff/arab-league_b_1307390.html
Posted on: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 18:04:58 +0000