This report from the BBC (not exactly pro-Russian) is from right after the MH17 crash. There is indeed question of other aircraft in the air, but clear thinking, all witnesses that the Kiev aircraft, since the same aircraft that their continuous bombings. The Kiev regime itself says at that time that the aircraft was no different, but a BUK attack, by the Russians. That has since been proven false (including the photos and film that were shown as evidence by Kiev) and even Washington its no longer about it. Now the BUK story rattles at all (or the wreckage denial of a plane attack impossible?), there is suddenly a new version of the plane attack. Only wants to do now believe that Russia Kiev us with combat aircraft was active in fighting over Eastern Ukraine. We heard absolutely nothing about at the time, while this evidence may be adopted, that if Kiev had (and thats easy sat in such a case, especially with that American satellite above the area) we would have heard that ad nauseum. But again: at the time, said everyone that it the BUK was and before that they had evidence (however never displayed), on the basis of which they proclaimed the sanctions against Russia. Kiev (Washington) has the story already adjusted several times since the crash, referring to evidence that will be shown or not, however, be or do not survive a critical analysis. At the same time they have no valid explanation why ordinary planes were allowed to fly above the area yet, why Kiev a day earlier a BUK-system in the area, and right after the crash again deleted, why the SUB (CIA) invaded the Air Traffic Control Tower and all the recordings of the conversations between the tower and took the plane (recordings have since been gone), where Carlos has remained (which about this on Twitter reported), why hide behind her as a tactic combat aircraft left Kiev commercial airlines just before an attack, why there are 2 fighter jets in the area at the time of the crash, why the Kiev radar system in the area (necessary when a BUK attack) was activated just before the crash as the German Government reported in Parliament. And of course why they have made no mention of that at the time Russian combat aircraft which would be fighting over the area. The NOS choose again for the stories from Kiev to take over indiscriminately. A more critical attitude towards Kiev would be more appropriate.
Posted on: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 21:27:20 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015