Topic spot - Manmohans office intervened in Madras HC judge case: GovtThe PMO during Manmohan Singhs tenure had asked why the Supreme Court collegium had not recommended extension for a Madras High Court judge who was facing corruption charges after the collegium expressed its hesitation, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said in Parliament today.Giving details of the controversial case over which Parliament witnessed uproar over last two days, he said in 2003, the Supreme Court collegium had certain reservations and had made some enquiries and decided that the case of this judge should not be taken up.But later during the UPA rule, a clarification was sought by the Prime Ministers Office (PMO) as to why he should not be recommended, the minister said in the Lok Sabha.The collegium again said he should not have been recommended at all, he said about the case which was recently brought to light by former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju.Later, the Department of Justice in the Law Ministry wrote a note to the collegium following which it said that his case can be considered for some extension, Prasad said, adding the matter stood there thereafter....on July 16, 2005 to be precise, again a note went from the then Department of Justice with the approval of the then Law Minister indicating about certain sensitivity. Thereafter, a call was taken by the collegium that his case can be considered for some extension and he was made permanent, he said.The Law Minister said the judge has since retired and was no more now. The judges of the collegium have also retired.Quoting Supreme Courts observation in Shanti Bhushan case, he remarked the clock cannot be put back.His response came after an uproar over the issue forced two adjournments of the Lok Sabha as agitated AIADMK members stormed the Well demanding that the name of the then DMK minister who pressurised the UPA government to confirm the appointment of controversial judge be made public.The Rajya Sabha also saw disruption on the issue, with AIADMK and DMK members clashing on the matter when it assembled for the day leading to a brief adjournment.The concern raised by the AIADMK members was well appreciated and there is imperative need to improve the system of judges appointment, Prasad said, adding the government was quite keen to appoint a National Judicial Commission for making such appointments. Read More: Manmohan's office intervened in Madras HC judge case: Govt himanishThe PMO during Manmohan Singhs tenure had asked why the Supreme Court collegium had not recommended extension for a Madras High Court judge who was facing corruption charges after the collegium expressed its hesitation, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said in Parliament today.Giving details of the controversial case over which Parliament witnessed uproar over last two days, he said in 2003, the Supreme Court collegium had certain reservations and had made some enquiries and decided that the case of this judge should not be taken up.But later during the UPA rule, a clarification was sought by the Prime Ministers Office (PMO) as to why he should not be recommended, the minister said in the Lok Sabha.The collegium again said he should not have been recommended at all, he said about the case which was recently brought to light by former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju.Later, the Department of Justice in the Law Ministry wrote a note to the collegium following which it said that his case can be considered for some extension, Prasad said, adding the matter stood there thereafter....on July 16, 2005 to be precise, again a note went from the then Department of Justice with the approval of the then Law Minister indicating about certain sensitivity. Thereafter, a call was taken by the collegium that his case can be considered for some extension and he was made permanent, he said.The Law Minister said the judge has since retired and was no more now. The judges of the collegium have also retired.Quoting Supreme Courts observation in Shanti Bhushan case, he remarked the clock cannot be put back.His response came after an uproar over the issue forced two adjournments of the Lok Sabha as agitated AIADMK members stormed the Well demanding that the name of the then DMK minister who pressurised the UPA government to confirm the appointment of controversial judge be made public.The Rajya Sabha also saw disruption on the issue, with AIADMK and DMK members clashing on the matter when it assembled for the day leading to a brief adjournment.The concern raised by the AIADMK members was well appreciated and there is imperative need to improve the system of judges appointment, Prasad said, adding the government was quite keen to appoint a National Judicial Commission for making such appointments.
Posted on: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 18:19:15 +0000