Tribune. What we is communism? Key words: communism, pierre zarka,. By Pierre Zarka, Association of Unitarian Communists. Lets say that mention communism away emergencies. But the contribution of Communism is not the dream, it changes the center of gravity of the clash of classes. Socrates asked his students: a man walks and arrives in front of a ravine; He turns right, walks and arrives back to a ravine. He still turns to the right and still reach a ravine; then resumes once again; It is therefore surrounded by ravines. How out? » Students remain cois. Socrates said to them: the answer was how he got there? You have not found any solution because you are remained locked in the terms where the problem was posed while should release you. » This does not apply to us? The ideological framework in which our problems are posed is one created by the capital. To fight with these terms leaves us like those bees that, wanting to go out the window, continue to face to the glass. An important part of the disappointed feel, making them available to reflect on another route. What can get out us of the feeling of helplessness, is to address the present and emergencies from a different conception of society. If capitalism is in crisis, think the apres-capitalisme is not only a goal but becomes a lever. Lets say that mention communism away emergencies. But the contribution of Communism is not the dream, it changes the center of gravity of the clash of classes. The work of Communist unit for rethinking communism are not those of a club but are of political action. Two examples: According to Marx, unlike the Soviet experience, communism implies a process of decline of the State. What can such a concept be used? Go to election in election so that the situation continues to deteriorate feeds a sense of powerlessness. Gold, which reduced citizenship in the only elections, if the bourgeoisie? If we were to think that democracy, it is done by yourself with fellow, without waiting for the State, we think that common to all the struggles and expectations, it is hoped a power to impose. Then politics would revolve less around leaders around how our actions have for meaning to wrest share of can do . This is that promotes the convergence of all the fighting. If employees are freed of any notion of dependency, in which company they would still be at the mercy of a hypothetical transferee? Communism, it is, says Marx, wage-earning exceeding. Science fiction? It was believed. But should we consider that the only useful to society moments are those passed in the company? Only the exploiters have interest to thus define the production of wealth. When teachers take care of children, it is recognised useful, and when parents or grandparents take care of the same children, this would be more? Should it be in a market logic and an activity constraint to be recognized? Can the qualification not use standard to ensure income during all moments of life? Utopia? What are already maternity leave, training leave, but also paid Union hours, paid leave? Grow, be in good health brings nothing to the economy? Would the fight for retirement or unemployment not stronger if report work - out work was experienced as a producer of wealth? Were these words inaudible? It has no political discussion without that the notion of power is embossed. Ask employees who are cooperative? By no longer be overseen by one authority other than their own. And the intermittents du spectacle? Overflow work - off-duty dissociation. From what we want to fight what is, addressing the present from what is not yet can unleash a huge potential and change deeply who takes the initiative and what the news is made.
Posted on: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:44:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015