Tsikata associates himself to the submissions made by the first and second Respondents. He points out that the report explicitly spells out the exhibit numbers of the 1045 pink sheets said to be unclear. Wherever the exhibit is recorded with whatever identification mark available those are recorded. The report of the referee addresses all the orders of the judges comprehensively. What the Petitioners are seeking to do is to effectively go outside the orders given by the judges. The Petitioners opposed the referee to be appointed and also opposed the count of the President’s set. They are now asking the referee to do a job outside the direction of the referee. The evidence of the referee’s rep explained out unique pink sheets can be derived. As far as further and better particulars are concerned, the referee cannot be asked to go back to it because it will delay the process all the more. He says what is being sought for by the Petitioners is completely different from the orders of the court to the referee. Addison seeks leave of the court to clear some issues. He says all the pink sheets served on the the referee does not have full information to make a clear identification of all the evidence. Not the doing of the Petitioners but the doing of the second Respondent and its officers. The application is intended to tie all the loose ends in the report. He says they brought the application at the earliest opportunity. The Court announces to deliberate on the arguments during recess and will deliver its ruling. Meanwhile Afari Gyan enters the dock.
Posted on: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 12:33:50 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015