Understanding the ECONOMIC motives behind the Anti-Semitim Charge. Its deeper than you may think: [Excerpt from the article, WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT THE UNRELENTING JEWISH HATE? PT.2 So, let us get to that ubiquitous “Black anti-Semitism” charge. As we have now learned through the Secret Relationship Between Blacks & Jews, vol. 2, the Jewish strategy for their own empowerment was based in economics--not politics. But when their fabled “friendship” with Blacks started in the early NAACP, these wealthy Jewish “philanthropists” insisted that the Black organizations they financed had NO ECONOMIC AGENDA! The Jewish Joel Spingarn became chairman of the NAACP board in 1913. He had a name for this kind of negro futures manipulation: he pointedly called it “NON-ECONOMIC LIBERALISM.” This is no small consideration. The same people who made all of their money on Black economic muscle financed a leadership strategy that steered Blacks in the very opposite direction! So from the earliest stages of this Black-Jewish “alliance,” or “friendship,” or whatever they like to call it, our Jewish-financed and -supported organizations—NAACP, Urban League, among them—actually prevented Blacks from developing the economic knowledge to run their own affairs and pushed them away from any ability to ever challenge Jewish business dominance in our own communities. Such a crippling lack of business knowledge keeps us consumers, farm hands, and voters, never business owners, employers, or financiers. We’ve been bamboozled. Let us be clear: ANY Black leader that might expose this corrupt and manipulative leadership design or correct it by proposing an economic model—even if that model mirrors that of the Jews—is a mortal threat to the Jewish wealth-building network. Long before Minister Farrakhan was attacked with this ugly charge of “anti-Semitism,” Jewish sociologist Jack Nusan Porter was one of many scholars who made reference to this phenomenon. He wrote that “The common stereotype of Jews owning the businesses in Black ghettos is based on solid evidence, not fantasy. Jews in the East and Midwest own a disproportionate number of businesses in Black areas.” Two other Jewish researchers found the same to be true in cities like Gary, Los Angeles, Miami, and Houston; and any other Southern city with a sizable Black population, Jewish merchants abound. The Secret Relationship explains that this Black revenue vein was so lucrative to Jews that mass migrations of Blacks were shadowed by Jewish merchants. When 65,000 Blacks left South Carolina for Louisiana and Mississippi in the 1830s, “[s]ome Jews,” according to historian Elliott Ashkenazi, “can be found making the same migration.” For this to work for Jews, Blacks must remain devoid of the knowledge of business and economics. The term “anti-Semitism,” then, is far more than a political label—it is a signal to the Jews in key places in the world economy that all disruptive power must be directed at the one so charged, and that that one is an unacceptable danger to the wealth of the Jewish people. Let us not think for a millisecond that the Jewish people who call The Minister an “anti-Semite” have any justification at all for the charge—they have a reason but absolutely no justification. Let us be absolutely clear about that. Only the readers of The Secret Relationship, Vol. 2 will be able to answer the question—Why would Jews push on us a strategy different from the one they used for their own astounding success? The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad said that “Integration is a hypocritical trick to make you think that your four hundred year old enemy has all of [a] sudden become your friend.” Indeed this is the “tricknollegy” in its most blatant sense. Those Blacks who sought to generate an economy-focused movement among Blacks—like the Honorable Marcus M. Garvey—were bitterly attacked by guess who? The Jewish-controlled NAACP! They called him an “anti-Semite” and even got their paid Negro leaders to run a divisive and bitter campaign they called “Garvey Must Go.” When the Honorable Elijah Muhammad brought us “Do-For-Self,” the same people labeled him an “anti-Semite” even though they admitted in their secret internal memos that they had NO EVIDENCE to back it up! When Minister Farrakhan stood up in 1987 and said “POLITICS WITHOUT ECONOMICS IS SYMBOL WITHOUT SUBSTANCE,” he became the enemy of those unkosher gangsters who have always run our economics. As The Messenger would say, “Think over that.” noirg.org/what-do-we-do-about-the-%E2%80%A8unrelenting-jewish-hate-pt-2/
Posted on: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:57:23 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015