VERSE 10. And they had tails like unto scorpions; and there were stings in their tails; and their power was to hurt men five months. The authority of the companions of Mahomet expired with their lives; and the chiefs or emirs of the Arabian tribes left behind in the desert the spirit of equality and independence. The legal and sacerdotal characters were united in the successors of Mahomet; and if the Koran was the rule of their actions, they were the supreme judges and interpreters of that divine book. They reigned by the right of conquest over the nations of the East, to whom the name Liberty was unknown, and who were accustomed to applaud in their tyrants the acts of violence and severity that were exercised at their own expense. Thus far Keith has furnished us with illustrations of the sounding of the first five trumpets. But here we must take leave of him, and, in applying the prophetic periods, pursue another course. THE TORMENT OF THE GREEKS ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS. Their power was to hurt men five months. 1. The question arises, What men were they to hurt five months? Undoubtedly, the same they were afterwards to slay [see verse 15]. The third part of men, or third of the Roman Empire—the Greek division of it. 2. When were they to begin their work of torment? The 11th verse answers the question: They had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. 1. They had a king over them. From the death of Mahomet until near the close of the 13th century, the Mahometans were divided into various factions, under several leaders, with no general civil government extending over them all. Near the close of the 13th century, Othman founded a government, which has since been known as the Ottoman government, or empire, extending over all the principal Mahometan tribes, consolidating them into one grand monarchy. 2. The character of the king. Which is the angel of the bottomless pit. An angel signifies a messenger, or minister, either good or bad; not always a spiritual being. The angel of the bottomless pit, or chief minister of the religion which came from thence when it was opened. That religion is Mahometanism, and the Sultan is its chief minister. The sultan, or grand signior, as he is indifferently called, is also supreme caliph, or high priest, uniting in his person the highest spiritual dignity with the supreme secular authority.—World as it Is, p. 361. When the address of The Worlds Anti-Slavery Convention was presented to Mehemet Ali, he expressed his willingness to act in the matter, but said he could do nothing, they must go to the heads of religion at Constantinople, that is, the sultan. 3. His name. In Hebrew, Abaddon, the destroyer; in Greek, Apollyon, one that exterminates or destroys. Having two different names in the two languages, it is evident that the character, rather than the name of the power, is intended to be represented. If so, in both languages he is a destroyer. Such has always been the character of the Ottoman government. Says Perkins: He [the sultan] has unlimited power over the lives and property of his subjects, especially of the high officers of State whom he can remove, plunder, or put to death at pleasure. They are required submissively to kiss the bow-string which he sends them, where-with they are to be strangled. All the above remarks apply to the Ottoman government in a striking manner. But when did Othman make his first assault on the Greek Empire? According to Gibbon (Decline and Fall, &c.), Othman first entered the territory of Nicomedia on the 27th day of July, 1299. The calculations of some writers have gone upon the supposition that the period should begin with the foundation of the Ottoman Empire; but this is evidently an error; for they not only were to have a king over them, but were to torment men five months. But the period of torment could not begin before the first attack of the tormentors, which was as above, July 27, 1299. The calculation which follows, founded on this starting-point, was made and published in Christs Second Coming, &c., by the author, in 1838. And their power was to hurt men five months. Thus far their commission extended to torment, by constant depredations, but not politically to kill them. Five months; that is, one hundred and fifty years. Commencing July 27, 1299, the one hundred and fifty years reach to 1449. During that whole period the Turks were engaged in an almost perpetual warfare with the Greek Empire, but yet without conquering it. They seized upon and held several of the Greek provinces, but still Greek independence was maintained in Constantinople. But in 1449, the termination of the one hundred and fifty years, a change came. Before presenting the history of that change, however, we will look at verses 12-15. THE SIXTH TRUMPET. THE OTTOMAN SUPREMACY IN CONSTANTINOPLE THREE HUNDRED AND NINETY-ONE YEARS AND FIFTEEN DAYS. VERSE 12-15. One woe is past; and behold, there come two woes more hereafter. And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God, saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates. And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men. The first woe was to continue from the rise of Mahometanism until the end of the five months. Then the first woe was to end, and the second begin. And when the sixth angel sounded, it was commanded to take off the restraints which had been imposed on the nation, by which they were restricted to the work of tormenting men, and their commission extended to slay the third part of men. This command came from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God. The four angels are the four principal sultanies of which the Ottoman Empire is composed, located in the country of the Euphrates. These sultanies were situated at Aleppo, Iconium, Damascus, and Bagdad. Previously they had been restrained; but God commanded, and they were loosed. In the year 1449, John Paleologus, the Greek emperor, died, but left no children to inherit his throne, and Constantine Deacozes succeeded to it. But he would not venture to ascend the throne without the consent of Amurath, the Turkish sultan. He therefore sent ambassadors to ask his consent, and obtained it, before he presumed to call himself sovereign. This shameful proceeding seemed to presage the approaching downfall of the empire. Ducas, the historian, counts John Paleologus for the last Greek emperor, without doubt, because he did not consider as such, a prince who had not dared to reign without the permission of the enemy. Let this historical fact be carefully examined in connection with the prediction above. This was not a violent assault made on the Greeks, by which their empire was overthrown and their independence taken away, but simply a voluntary surrender of that independence into the hands of the Turks, by saying, I cannot reign unless you permit. The four angels were loosed for an hour, a day, a month, and a year, to slay the third part of men. This period amounts to three hundred and ninety-one years and fifteen days; during which Ottoman supremacy was to exist in Constantinople. But, although the four angels were thus loosed by the voluntary submission of the Greeks, yet another doom awaited the seat of empire. Amurath, the sultan to whom the submission of Deacozes was made, and by whose permission he reigned in Constantinople, soon after died, and was succeeded in the empire, in 1451, by Mahomet II., who set his heart on Constantinople and determined to make it a prey. He accordingly made preparations for besieging and taking the city. The siege commenced on the 6th of April, 1453, and ended in the taking of the city and the death of the last of the Constantines, on the 16th day of May following. And the eastern city of the Caesars became the seat of the Ottoman Empire. The arms and mode of warfare which were used in the siege in which Constantinople was to be overthrown, and held in subjection, were distinctly noticed by the revelator. We will notice, first, the army. VERSE 16. And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand; and I heard the number of them. Innumerable hordes of horses and them that sat on them. Gibbon describes the first invasion of the Roman territories by the Turks thus: The myriads of Turkish horse overspread a frontier of six hundred miles from Tauris to Azeroum, and the blood of 130,000 Christians was a grateful sacrifice to the Arabian prophet. Whether the revelator designed to convey the idea of any definite number, the reader must judge. Some suppose 200,000 twice-told is meant, and then, following some historians, find that number of Turkish warriors in the siege of Constantinople. Some think 200,000,000 to mean all the Turkish warriors during the three hundred and ninety-one years and fifteen days of their triumph over the Greeks. I confess this to me appears the most likely. But as it cannot be ascertained whether this is the fact or not, I will affirm nothing on the point. VERSE 17. And thus I saw the horses in the vision, and them that sat on them, having breastplates of fire, and of jacinth, and brimstone; and the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions; and out of their mouth issued fire, and smoke, and brimstone. On this text I shall again refer to Mr. Keith for an illustration:— The color of fire is red, of hyacinth or jacinth blue, and of brimstone, yellow, and this, as Mr. Daubuz observes, has a literal accomplishment for the Othmans, from the first time of their appearance, have affected to wear such warlike apparel of scarlet, blue, and yellow. Of the Spahi particularly, some have red and some have yellow standards, and others red or yellow mixed with other colors. In appearance, too, the heads of the horses were as the heads of lions, to denote their strength, courage, and fierceness. Without rejecting so plausible an interpretation, the suggestion may not be unwarrantable that a still closer and more direct exposition may be given of that which the prophet saw in the vision. In the prophetic description of the fall of Babylon they who rode on horses are described as holding the bow and the lance; but it was with other arms than the arrow and the spear that the Turkish warriors encompassed Constantinople; and the breastplates of the horsemen, in reference to the more destructive implements of war, might then, for the first time, be said to be fire, and jacinth, and brimstone. The musket had recently supplied the place of the bow. Fire emanated from their breasts. Brimstone, the flame of which is jacinth, was an ingredient both of the liquid fire and of gunpowder. Congruity seems to require this more strictly literal interpretation, as conformable to the significancy of the same terms in the immediately subsequent verse, including the same general description. A new mode of warfare was at that time introduced which has changed the nature of war itself, in regard to the form of its instruments of destruction; and sounds and sights unheard of and unknown before, were the death-knell and doom of the Roman Empire. Invention outrivaled force, and a new power was introduced, that of musketry, as well as artillery, in the art of war, before which the old Macedonian phalanx would not have remained unbroken, nor the Roman legions stood. That which John saw in the vision, is read in the history of the times. VERSE 18. By these three was the third part of men killed, by the fire, and by the smoke, and by the brimstone, which issued out of their mouths. Among the implements of destruction, he studied with peculiar care the recent and tremendous discovery of the Latins, and his artillery surpassed whatever had yet appeared in the world. A founder of cannon, a Dane or Hungarian, who had been almost starved in the Greek service, deserted to the Moslems, and was liberally entertained by the Turkish sultan. Mahomet was satisfied with the answer to his first question, which he eagerly pressed on the artist, Am I able to cast a cannon capable of throwing a ball or stone of sufficient size to batter the walls of Constantinople? I am not ignorant of their strength, but were they more solid than those of Babylon, I could oppose an engine of superior power; the position and management of that engine must be left to your engineers. On this assurance a foundry was established at Adrianople; the metal was prepared; and at the end of three months Urban produced a piece of brass ordnance of stupendous and almost incredible magnitude. A measure of twelve palms was assigned to the bore, and the stone bullet weighed about six hundred pounds. A vacant place before the new palace was chosen for the first experiment: but to prevent the sudden and mischievous effects of astonishment and fear, a proclamation was issued that the cannon would be discharged the ensuing day. The explosion was felt or heard in the circuit of a hundred furlongs; the ball, by the force of the gunpowder, was driven about a mile, and on the spot where it fell it buried itself a fathom deep in the ground. For the conveyance of this destructive engine, a frame or carriage of thirty wagons was linked together, and drawn along by a train of sixty oxen; two hundred men on both sides were stationed to poise or support the rolling weight; two hundred and fifty workmen marched before to smooth the way and repair the bridges, and nearly two months were employed in a laborious journey of a hundred and fifty miles. I dare not reject the positive and unanimous evidence of cotemporary writers. A Turkish cannon, more enormous than that of Mahomet, still guards the entrance of the Dardanelles, and if the use be inconvenient, it has been found, on a late trial, that the effect is far from contemptible. A stone bullet of eleven hundred pounds weight was once discharged with three hundred and thirty pounds of powder; at the distance of six hundred yards it shivered into three rocky fragments, traversed the strait, and, leaving the waters in a foam, again rose and bounded against the opposite hill. In the siege, the incessant volleys of lances and arrows were accompanied with the smoke, the sound, and the fire of their musketry and cannon. Their small arms discharged at the same time five or even ten balls of lead of the size of a walnut, and according to the closeness of the ranks, and the force of the powder, several breast-plates and bodies were transpierced by the same shot. But the Turkish approaches were soon sunk in trenches, or covered with ruins. Each day added to the science of the Christians, but their inadequate stock of gunpowder was wasted in the operations of each day. Their ordnance was not powerful, either in size or number, and if they possessed some heavy cannon, they feared to plant them on the walls, lest the aged structure should be shaken and overthrown by the explosion. The same destructive secret had been revealed to the Moslems, by whom it was employed with the superior energy of zeal, riches, and despotism. The great cannon of Mahomet has been separately noticed; an important and visible object in the history of the times; but that enormous engine was flanked by two fellows almost of equal magnitude; the long order of the Turkish artillery was pointed against the walls; fourteen batteries thundered at once on the most accessible places, and of one of these it is ambiguously expressed that it was mounted with one hundred and thirty guns, or that it discharged one hundred and thirty bullets. Yet in the power and activity of the sultan we may discern the infancy of the new science; under a master who counted the moments, the great cannon could be loaded and fired no more than seven times in one day. The heated metal unfortunately burst; several workman were destroyed, and the skill of an artist was admired who bethought himself of preventing the danger and the accident by pouring oil after each explosion into the mouth of the cannon. This historical sketch from Gibbon, of the use of gunpowder, fire-arms, and cannon, as the instrumentality by which the city was finally overcome, is so illustrative of the text that one can hardly imagine any other scene can be described. The specified time for the continuance of Turkish or Mahometan supremacy over the Greek was an hour, day, month, and year. A prophetic year is three hundred and sixty days (or years, a month, thirty days (years); one day (one year and an hour, or the twenty-fourth part of a prophetic day, would be fifteen days. This last is easily calculated. Three hundred and sixty, the number of days in a prophetic year, divided by twenty-four, the number of house in a day, give us fifteen days. The whole period would be three hundred and ninety-one years and fifteen days. Commencing when the one hundred and fifty years ended, in 1449, the period would end August 11, 1840. Judging from the manner of the commencement of the Ottoman supremacy which was by a voluntary acknowledgement on the part of the Greek emperor that he only reigned by permission of the Turkish sultan, we should naturally conclude that the fall or departure of the Ottoman independence would be brought about in the same way; that at the end of the specified period, the sultan would voluntarily surrender his independence into the hand of the Christian powers, from whom he had received it When the foregoing calculation was made by Eld. Litch in 1838, it was purely a matter of calculation on the prophetic periods of Scripture. Now, however, the time is passed by, and it is proper to inquire what the result has been—whether it has corresponded with the previous calculation. I shall now pass to the question, Has the supremacy departed from the Mohometans into Christian hands, so that the Turks now exist and reign by the sufferance and permission of the Christian powers, as the Christians did for some two or three years by the permission of the Turks? First Testimony.—The following is from Rev. Mr. Goodell, missionary of the American Board at Constantinople, addressed to the Board, and by them published in the Missionary Herald, for April, 1841, p. 160:— The power of Islamism is broken forever; and there is no concealing the fact even from themselves. They exist now by mere sufferance. And though there is a mighty endeavor made to graft the institutions of civilized and Christian countries upon the decayed trunk, yet the very root itself is fast wasting away by the venom of its own poison. How wonderful it is, that, when all Christendom combined together to check the progress of Mahometan power, it waxed exceedingly great in spite of every opposition; and now, when all the mighty potentates of Christian Europe, who feel fully competent to settle all the quarrels, and arrange all the affairs of the whole world, are leagued together for its protection and defense, down it comes, in spite of all their fostering care. Mr. Goodell has been for ears a missionary in the Turkish dominions, and is competent to judge of the state of the government. His deliberate and unequivocal testimony is, that the power of Islamism is broken forever. But it is said the Turks yet reign! So also says our witnesses but it is by mere sufferance. They are at the mercy of the Christians. Their independence is broken. Another Witness.—Rev. Mr. Balch, of Providence, R. I., in an attack on Mr. Miller for saying that the Ottoman Empire fell in 1840 says:— How can an honest man have the hardihood to stand up before an intelligent audience, and make such an assertion, when the most authentic version of the change of the Ottoman Empire is that it has not been on a better foundation in fifty years, for it is now re-organized by the European kingdoms, and is honorably treated as such. But how does it happen that Christian Europe re-organized the government? What need of it if it was not dis-organized? If Christian Europe has done this, then it is now, to all intents and purposes, a Christian government, and is only ruled nominally by the sultan as their vassal. This testimony is the more valuable for having come from an opponent. We could not have selected and put together words more fully expressive of the idea of the present state of the Ottoman Empire. It is true the Christian governments of Europe have re-organized the Turkish Empire, and it is their creature. From 1840 to the present time, the Ottoman government has been under the dictation of the great powers of Europe; and scarcely a measure of that government has been adopted and carried out without the interference and dictation of the allies; and that dictation has been submitted to by them. It is in this light politicians have looked upon the government since 1840, as the following item will show. The London Morning Herald, after the capture of St. Jean dAcre, speaking of the state of things in the Ottoman Empire, says:— We (the allies) have conquered St. Jean dAcre. We have dissipated into thin air the prestige that lately invested, as with a halo, the name of Mehemet Ali. We have, in all probability, destroyed forever the power of that hitherto successful ruler. But have we done aught to restore strength to the Ottoman Empire? We fear not. We fear that the sultan has been reduced to the rank of a puppet; and that the sources of the Turkish Empires strength are entirely destroyed. If the supremacy of the sultan is hereafter to be maintained in Egypt, it must be maintained, we fear, by the unceasing intervention of England and Russia. What the London Morning Herald last November feared, has since been realized. The sultan has been entirely, in all the great questions which have come up, under the dictation of the Christian kingdoms of Europe. WHEN DID MAHOMETAN INDEPENDENCE IN CONSTANTINOPLE DEPART? In order to answer this question understandingly, it will be necessary to review briefly the history of that power for a few years past. For several years the sultan has been embroiled in war with Mehemet Ali, pacha of Egypt. In 1838 there was a threatening of war between the sultan and his Egyptian vassal. Mehemet Ali, pacha, in a note addressed to the foreign consuls, declared that in future he would pay no tribute to the Porte, and that he considered himself independent sovereign of Egypt, Arabia, and Syria. The sultan, naturally incensed at this declaration, would have immediately commenced hostilities had he not been restrained by the influence of the foreign ambassadors, and persuaded to delay. This war, however, was finally averted by the announcement of Mehemet, that he was ready to pay a million of dollars, arrearages of tribute which he owed the Porte, and an actual payment of $750,000, in August of that year. In 1839, hostilities again commenced, and were prosecuted, until, in a general battle between the armies of the sultan and Mehemet, the sultans army was entirely cut up and destroyed, and his fleet taken by Mehemet and carried into Egypt. So completely had the sultans fleet been reduced, that, when hostilities commenced in August, he had only two first-rates and three frigates, as the sad remains of the once powerful Turkish fleet. This fleet Mehemet positively refused to give up and return to the sultan, and declared, if the powers attempted to take it from him he would burn it. In this posture affairs stood, when, in 1840, England, Russia, Austria, and Prussia, interposed, and determined on a settlement of the difficulty; for it was evident, if let alone, Mehemet would soon become master of the sultans throne.
Posted on: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:21:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015