WELL NOW!!! I see yet another footer has tried to remove a thread once their bullshit was called out!!! Good thing Im quicker on the draw than most footers and have saved this fabulous thread of assumptive silliness... Robert Wolfman Bratcher 1 hr I want to post something educational and fun to get over this slander post that has got me really down today, so I thought Id share the science topic of the Week that I posted on the Unit Bigfoot, DNA, blood types, and other evidence for the formation of a theory of the origin and evolution of a novel North American hominid. Is Bigfoot is a human hybrid or a better description, a human unknown hominid resulting from interbreeding? Currently what little DNA evidence that has been analyzed show models suggesting that Sasquatch is a mix or cross breed species the same as modern man supporting the replacement-hybridization theory. That at some time in the creatures evolutionary history that at least two humanoid hominid species from the same family tree interbreed. Today it has been proven that many Caucasians, Asians and extensively so with Native Americans have both Neanderthal, Denisovan 1 & 2, Cro-magnon and modern DNA. So where does our big hairy friend fit into all this? Currently new theories are emerging, these theories show where chimps, gibbons and other primates are not just humans evolutionary cousins, but are also our blood brothers. Evidence and new research supports that the A, B and O blood types in people evolved at least 20 million years ago in a common ancestor of humans and other primates, and likely Sasquatch. That means we did not come from apes but share a common ancestor, and some new research suggest that the great apes maybe a devolved species of humans. The ABO blood system has persisted over time, this lends rather convincing evidence that this is a shared, very old capability that has remained throughout the divergence of the species. The A, B and O versions of the gene causing blood type differs only slightly, and scientists have debated two scenarios to explain blood type evolution. One points to the A version of the gene existing long ago, and the B and/or O versions later cropping up independently in several species including humans, gorillas, baboons and chimps. The alternate theory is that all of those species may have inherited the A and B types from a single ancestor as the A and B blood groups were around at least 20 million years ago well before the chimp-human split, and probably as far back as the common ancestor of humans and old-world monkeys. After the split of man and ape of the hominid family tree, there is good evidence in world blood distribution from at least four separate groups in human evolution. These are represented by Cro-Magnon Man, Neanderthal, Denisovans and perhaps another 1-2 yet unidentified hominid ancestors that make up what we are today. The early European race is characterized by a high percentage of Rh-negatives, a very low B-frequency and a relatively high A2 frequency... probably some connection with post-glacial Cro-Magnon Man, and the Asiatic race is characterized by a high frequency of A and B and a low frequency of Rh-negatives suggesting Neanderthal, Denisovans and other influences. Now for a possible theory for the origin of Sasquatch. If anything Sasquatch is a cross breed species like modern man, that is two species, in this case at least two human early hominid species from the same family tree mated and produced the hominid we call Bigfoot. The difference in modern man and Bigfoot is that we are missing the DNA from Squatchs paternal ancestor. We share the same mitochondrial DNA that comes from the maternal line but not the same paternal ancestors as limited Sasquatch DNA studies suggest. Just as today it has been proven that modern man is a mix of many other early hominids, we suggest that at one time a primitive yet unidentified hominid at some point interbred with the early homo sapiens blend and that DNA combination formed what we call Bigfoot today. Bigfoot is the formation of a new species that resulted from a slightly different DNA configuration as our own early in the hominid tree formation. Remember we share 99% of the same DNA as chimps. Bigfoot’s paternal heritage give them their size, strength, hair and other evolutionary traits. LikeLike · · Share 2 people like this. Russ Mock If you are going to attempt to present scientific evidence and information then you should really remain consistent and use the scientific definition of the term theory. What you refer to as theory above is not, it is the colloquial definition. And wh...See More 55 mins · Unlike · 1 Robert Wolfman Bratcher Russ Mock I presented this in simple terms for enjoyment and ease of reading... I have 5 degree including a graduate degree so I can get technical, I merely presented this for thought and discussion. I have been accused of writing too technical so I a...See More 19 mins · Like Jeff Sauber Heres a simple fact, and it doesnt require rocket science to comprehend it either. Sasquatch is still in the imaginative phase. It is a belief system figure head....See More 6 mins · Edited · Like Jeff Sauber I love these elaborate spins & assumptions the footers attempt to soak their favorite creature of fantasy in to help it sound more plausible and connected with factual reality.. Sprinkle a little scientific flavoring on a little hype/assumption....and PRESTO!! You too can make sasquatch sound alive & well. ...See More 2 mins · Like Jeff Sauber Bigfoot is the formation of a new species that resulted from a slightly different DNA configuration as our own early in the hominid tree formation. Remember we share 99% of the same DNA as chimps. Bigfoot’s paternal heritage give them their size, strength, hair and other evolutionary traits. Bigfoot IS?? IS??? Says who? IS implies it actually exists..... I challenge any footer to present factual evidence that sasquatch IS in existence. Unable to post comment. Try Again
Posted on: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 15:11:07 +0000