WHAT MAKAU MUTUA SAYS (verbatim) “Ms Bensouda has asserted – and the judges concur – that the Kenyan Government hasn’t cooperated with the ICC. In plain language, the Kenyan Government, of which Mr Kenyatta is the principal, has obstructed justice. This is the finding of the ICC judges, not one Makau,” “Logic says that Mr Kenyatta is the beneficiary of the collapse of the evidentiary basis of the case. That’s why the inference of guilt can never go away absent a full trial. A cloud will always hang over his head.” WHAT THE JUDGES SAID “It has also been submitted that the alleged non- compliance or obstruction on the part of the Kenyan Government can be attributed to Mr Kenyatta...First, to the extent that this submission is directed towards alleging that there has been deliberate interference by Mr Kenyatta, the Chamber notes that no substantiation for such an Allegation has been provided. Indeed, the Prosecution has conceded that it has no evidence to support such an allegation. Second, to the extent that the submission is premised simply on Mr Kenyattas political influence and constitutional functions as Head of State, the Chamber considers that this might be a valid factor worthy of serious consideration in circumstances where it had been established that there is a realistic prospect of sufficient, concrete evidence being secured. However, as discussed above, this is not the situation in the present case.” WHAT WT SAYS “Thanks God for giving me the ability to read and understand what others deliberately fail to accept, even when its in PLAIN language.
Posted on: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 13:21:15 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015