WHATS HOCKEY HIDING? It will be interesting to see the result of Hockeys defamation case against Fairfax media at the Federal Court in March given Sandy Dawson (who is set to cross examine Hockey at the Federal Court of Australia in March.) was threated by Hockeys barrister Mr McClintock at court in September 2014 stating “If the imputations are conveyed you are f—–.””) not long before Mr Dawsons sister, Katrina Dawson, was killed in the Sydney siege. Abbott and Hockey were both rattled when questioned by journalists about the federal implications of the New South Wales stink. In a press conference after the resignation of Barry O’Farrell, Abbott was asked by journalist Nicola Berkovic whether he trusted the New South Wales government, “which is proving to be corrupt”. Abbott bristled. “That is an entirely unjustified smear,” Since that press conference, of course, even more New South Wales government ministers and backbenchers have stood down. Hockeys office replied with accusations made in Fairfax Media today are both offensive and repugnant,” he wrote. “The Treasurer will not let this distract him from the important task of putting the Budget together. As the matter is now in the hands of lawyers no further comment can be made.” If Hockeys fundraising operations were entirely legal and above-board, why is he refusing to answer legitimate questions about who attended, who donated, and what was discussed? If Hockey genuinely believes he is innocent, why not simply put forward the available evidence that clears this up? Why stonewall? Why sue? Keep your eyes peeled on March court case ........ https://newmatilda/2014/05/06/whats-hockey-hiding
Posted on: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 14:50:55 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015