Want to win an argument with someone who believes its a fact that we descend from primates (evolution)? I have been getting pretty good at debate lately because of Lloyd Pyes work. (I am simply learning enough facts to question these people who think theyre tin gods in science) Heres my notes: 1. Remind them there is no missing link. (there never will be, because in order to show an evolution there would need to be several other skeletons lined up to that missing link and I will explain - the answer is in genetics) 2. There is plenty of evidence that hominoids are in the fossil record. But those are not human bones. There is not even ONE HUMAN bone in the fossil record before 250 thousand years ago. Humans did not exist genetically before that according to the fossil record. Scientists will agree with this fact. (stay on point - remember were talking about evidence of evolving from hominoids. Scientists dont like the term hominoids because it refers to ape and chimpanzee origin and follows up to the homonids - specifically neanderthal and cro-magnon - which are still not human) 3. The period of time in question (where they expect the missing link to be) shows a sudden leap when homo sapiens arrives on the scene. Whats really going to rip up their theory is that primates have 48 chromosomes and humans have only 46. Thats a lot of DNA to lose, and were superior. (this alone makes the theory fall flat on its face, but supports some sort of genetic tampering) 4. All higher animals share at least 50% of their DNA. Humans, apes and chimpanzees are the closest running 98 to 99 percent similarity. But considering there are about THREE BILLION base pairs, there are a COUPLE OF THOUSAND base pairs that are totally different. So that claim isnt so impressive. 5. Our physiology enables us to speak, Apes and chimps CANNOT because they dont have the required equipment. Look it up. (so thats yet more evidence that theyll have to come up with several more skeletons in this supposed chain to prove this theory. BUT, not so simple, read on...) 6. Our cerebral cortex is 4X that of an ape, yet we only use 10% of our brain power (proven) the apes and chimps use everything theyve got. 7. So you see there is a lot of difference between humans and hominoids. There is strong evidence of genetic tampering about 250,000 years ago. The strongest evidence is the chromosomes, and the fact that humans have about 4,000 different genetic defects. You dont see anything like this in nature with other animals. Every now and then you see pictures where eggs failed to split and animals have 2 heads, or several limbs, etc. but you dont have the string of genetic DEFECTS like humans do. Each one of us walking around have the genes for about 50 defects in our body. Your children who might marry someone with one of the 50 defects will produce a 1 in 4 chance of the defect expressing - meaning that the defect is obvious, like Spina Bifida. Is this starting to make some sense? For further clues check out Rh negative factors, and repeated DNA sequencing of Y chromosomes. Also, dont fail to ask them for an answer to Entropy or the 2nd law of Thermodynamics (entropy cant be accounted for with their theories) also ask them if evolution is a fact, then how did single-celled organisms develop? (No answer. which came first? the chicken or the egg?) And I havent even touched on the fact that primate physiology is very different from our own. Their rib cages, strength, bone density...all different. Id like to see the string of skeletal missing links that show how the rib cage evolved from narrow at the top and wide on the bottom to the reverse. You can Bartel and Szostak me all you want, but it still doesnt change these facts. Particularly the fact that primates have 48 chromosomes and humans have only 46 yet are superior. Tell them Its GENETICS, stupid. Want to bake your noodle even further? Google Paracas Skulls research why theyre different. So as far as theories are concerned, the empirical evidence actually points to interference rather than evolution. Remember evolution isnt the same as adaptation, which is provable and a fact. But evolution is a different thing altogether. Personally, I think the earth is very, very old and there is evidence of previous civilizations. Research Megalithic sites, for more information. I do not necessarily disagree with the Biblical version either. There is something called the Gap Theory, which explains there is a space of unaccountable time between creation - and when the earth was void and covered with water. See Gen 1:1-2. It is my belief, and many others, that the world was possibly re-created at that 6,000 year mark, but the evidence of previous civilization is overwhelming. You should save these notes in case you need them. Because a simplificatioin of the facts like this isnt easy to obtain. Just because Im quoting these facts, doesnt mean I subscribe to ANY other theory than the ones I put in print here. I can think for myself, thank you. I am not a scientist and this is not my research. I am only condensing and simplifying facts so that they are understandable. I am getting these facts from Lloyd Pyes work. You can do further research by reviewing his books. I do not subscribe to ALL of Pyes theories, but facts speak for themselves. This is my original article and I reserve all copyright ~ Sue
Posted on: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:05:36 +0000