Wards of Court Why you should never use an attorney... In Propria Persona: In one’s own proper person. It was formerly a rule in pleading that pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be plead in propria persona, because if pleaded by an Attorney they admit the jurisdiction, as an Attorney is an Officer of the Court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained Leave, which admits the jurisdiction. And there you have it. An Attorney is a Bounty Hunter with a suit and tie on. He brings you before the Court and Leaves you there. Thus the Court has Leave (another way of saying they have jurisdiction over you). An Attorney is an Officer of the Court, thus his obligation is to the Court. To add insult to the injury, or to the corruption, the Court he is obligated to is a defacto court, a colorable court, operating in Collusion, and in color-of-law. This is more reason why you cannot utilize an Attorney. An attorney speaks for inanimate objects, corporations, who cannot speak for themselves. He or she possesses a Bar Association Card, which is a membership card -- it is not a license, besides a license to practice law does not exist. As well a license is permission to do something that is otherwise unlawful. Utilizing an Attorney admits you to their Jurisdiction, which is ABSOLUTELY inferior, they have no jurisdiction over you. They are inferior Courts and as such they possess no delegation of authority because legislation DOES NOT give administrative courts judicial powers. Boy, have we been duped! Municipal courts, Administrative Courts, and Officers of such Courts, administrators, Agencies and agents alike, etc., operate under Color-of-Law, even though they have taken an Oath to uphold the Constitution, and the laws of the United States (USC Codes). They have created a colorable jurisdiction, as they have no Jurisdiction over the Natural Person. Colorable persons or fictitious, persons, corporate persons, chattel property, fall up under their colorable jurisdiction. This is why it is so very important to Declare your Natural Status. Their authority is over those who are in their Jurisdiction, who subscribe to them, i.e.. Union States (U.S.) Citizens, corporations, those who are labeled Indian, Negroe, Colored, Black, etc. Thus it is necessary for you to Declare that you are not a corporate person, nor are you a member of the Union States Society. This is done through the universal process of Nationalization. First you must be a National, then you can Nationalize or do Inter-national trade, activity, etc. and claim your inheritance, your lost estate. Declaring your Nationality indicates your natural status and links you back to the human family and the Family of Nations. The right of a person under the 5th Amendment to refuse to incriminate himself is purely a personal privilege of the witness. It was never intended to permit him to plead the fact that some third person might be incriminated by his testimony, even though he were the agent of such person. -- Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43. Not only that, but if you allow anyone to represent you, instead of being the belligerent claimant in person (Hale v Henkel, i.s.c.), you become a ward of the court. Why? Because obviously, if someone else has to defend your rights for you, you must be incompetent! Clients are called wards of the court in regard to their relationship with their attorneys. See a copy of Regarding Lawyer Discipline & Other Rules, as well as Canons 1 through 9. Also, see Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), Volume 7, Section 4, Attorney & client: The attorneys first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. (emphasis mine) Lord Yeshua the Christ said in Luke 11:52 Woe unto you lawyers for ye have taken away the key of knowledge; ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered. And also in Matt 23:13,33 (NIV) You shut the kingdom of heaven in mens faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to ... How will you escape being condemned to hell? “A lawyer cannot claim that you have rights.” U.S. v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538 Lawyers cannot defend your rights because they are franchisees of the English bar association, a corporation that licenses its franchisees and regulates their activities. All a lawyer can do is get the master of the ship to go easy on you if you confess to the fiction claim against you. A lawyer will not help you prove your sovereignty for fear of being disbarred. The united States Supreme Court has ruled that the only person who can claim his rights is the belligerent claimant in person. To effectively accomplish this you must be able to establish the record with certifiable knowledge of the law. “The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant[Jesus style], nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. it is a fighting clause. its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. it can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. it is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person...once he testifies to part, he has waived his...he must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus.” US v Johnson, 76 F. Supp 538, 540 (1947). AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239) The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)) The CERTIFICATE from the State Supreme Court: ONLY authorizes, To practice Law IN COURTS as a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT, INFANTS, PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.) CERTIFICATE IS NOT A LICENSE to practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION, nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!! The STATE BAR CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!! It is a UNION DUES CARD. The BAR is a PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION. 1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc. 2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE. It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION. The State Bar is; An Unconstitutional Monopoly. AN ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE; Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the U.S Constitution. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive branches within a state as the BAR is attempting. BAR members have invaded all branches of government and are attempting to control de jure governments as agents of a foreign entity! It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of America. The American Bar is an offshoot from London Lawyers Guild and was established by people with invasive monopolistic goals in mind. In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state, and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America. The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930s to join when the treasonous Act became DE FACTO and the Citizens became captives. Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class. This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws. The Constitution was written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list. Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes and understand them without any trouble. The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the Bar Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations. They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for themselves. The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the State. Only the Bar Association, or their designated committees, can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar. On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committees, stated in essence, that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot. This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers. This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state. The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the people. After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of Europe. The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America. Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY, OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM. The U.S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT Republics. Also, the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only. All other people are limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class subject citizens. When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we the people, will NEVER rule against themselves.) In these Unconstitutional foreign tribunals courts (hoodlum centers), men in black dresses, that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) dispense a perverted ideology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms). The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders to the people, as a fiction court or a court/corporation for profit and gain cannot reach parity with a lawful man. ONLY Presidents and Governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with immunity from prosecution. Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc. This is Unconstitutional lawyer system, only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the fiction/for profit and gain courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10). The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION. LAWYERS and LAWYER-JUDGES: Created Unconstitutional lawyer system pre-trial motions and Hearings to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1, as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS. When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY NOT BY ANY TECHNICALITY. Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL and also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because OFFICERS OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH. These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLION OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, Constitution or Justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS. CASE LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL: As CASE LAW IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either Yes or No. The lawyer-judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he rules certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissible. This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), Officer of the Court. Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government, but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only two of the three branches of government. Lawyers, as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government. Lawyers, Officers of the Court, in the Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in two branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws. District attorneys and States attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the Grand Juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT interpret it. Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS: ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional lawyer system. In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyones will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and, at times, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate. An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX MONEY is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County/City/Borough Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are TRICKED and FORCED into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION. In the state of Alaska and Hawaii, the BAR ASSOCIATION has mandated that all judges are to be licensed to practice law (e.g. Alaska Constitution, Article IV, Section 4). This license requirement is not found in any other state of the Union. As all licenses to practice law in the state of Alaska and Hawaii are issued by a judge, what judge is qualified to issue a license to practice law to another judge? As only members of the Bar may be licensed to practice law (e.g. A.S. 08.08.020), Alaska and Hawaii judges are REQUIRED to be members of the BAR and as such, they are prejudiced to do the business of the BAR. If a judge is required to be a member of the BAR, who disqualifies the judge from office if that judge does not pay the dues or violates the rules of the BAR? Every state in the Union (with the exception of Alaska and Hawaii) prohibits judges from holding licenses to practice law. 
Posted on: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:08:22 +0000