We have mini meet of 3 person including me. We done the - TopicsExpress



          

We have mini meet of 3 person including me. We done the comparison our new Babys JVC HA FX 1100 vs their old Baby JVC HA FX 850 Source : AK 100 FAD , AK 100 Gold Japan Edition and AK 240 Dac / Amp : Aurender Flow Chord Hugo Iems : 3 JVC HA FX 1100 1 JVC HA FX 850 Cable : Sys Concept Optical Cable 5.00 mm Out the box JVC FX 1100 vs JVC FX 850 already 300 hours burn in The result as follow High : 1100 has better sweet and polite treble, better texture and suitable for long term listening. 850 has clean treble and more `lively` or sparkly / shimmery. Mid: 1100 has more meat / fleshed out - more vivid and intimate. This is 1100 forte and calling card. 850 has good mid but less thick and less upfront / just a hair but not recessed. Bass: 1100 has better bass texture and less mid bass hump and more bass refined. Good for audiophile jazz, vocals, acoustic and progressive rock. 850 has lively attack in bass but still has that mid bass hump that is more appropriate with trance / hiphop and modern music. 1100 is so appropriate with classical music where one can feel the build up, the slow passages and ambience, especially strings have vivid feel and weight on each notes. Others: 1100 has better ambience, taller and space, more 3D so to speak but can feel a bit slower with perceived attack due to more immersive mids, decay and more sweet treble. 850 is more lively and clear and more pronounced attack but less 3D and less height compared to 1100. Depending on music, these two share JVC house sound, but my vote goes to 1100, with better cables / silver coated copper i think the attack will be much improved but the vividness of 1100 is close to perfection. Our opinion ( me .Robby and Sindarta )
Posted on: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:39:18 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015