What an amazingly dense flurry of lies, suggestive thinking and dialogue-controlling cultural conditioning efforts by our prodigal student of Edward L Bernays. How many occurrences of social engineering can you pick out in a minute and thirteen seconds of the most advanced black magic propaganda science on Earth? Heres my take: ”Our(1) police officers put their lives on the line for us(1) every single day. They have a tough job to do(2); to maintain public safety(3) and hold accountable those who break the law(4). As they do their jobs(2) in the coming days, they need to work with the community, not against the community, to distinguish the handful of people who may use the grand jury’s decision as an excuse(5) for violence, [to] distinguish them from the vast majority who just want their voices heard(6) around legitimate issues in terms of how communities and law enforcement interact(7). Finally, we need to recognize that the situation in Ferguson speaks to broader challenges that we still face as a nation. The fact is in too many parts of this country a deep distrust exists between law enforcement and communities of color(8). Some of this is the result of the legacy of racial discrimination in this country, and this is tragic because nobody needs good policing(9) more than poor communities(10) with higher crime rates(11). “ 1. “Our” and “us” in reference to the aristocracy, or corporatocracy, esp. those who profit from the Federal Reserve and the banking and giant financial institutions in the U.S. 2. To maintain the status quo by I. protecting the aristocracy and their interests and II. taxing and weakening the poor and working classes by many means, including violence and murder. 3. The exact opposite of the truth, as exemplified by the police murder of Michael Brown, an innocent, unarmed child. 4. Only those poor and working class people who commit small crimes which do not effect things on a large scale. This statement is not true for the banksters who triggered this recession/depression and who were caught running giant Ponzi schemes, nor for the federal politicians who took bribes from these banksters and then gave them over a trillion of our tax dollars, who sign unconstitutional legislation like the Patriot Act, and who commit unconstitutional acts like declaring congressional martial law in order to expedite the passing into law of the unconstitutional 800 billion dollar “stimulus” bill, and who declare unconstitutional executive orders, or for the federal judges who take bribes from the banksters and who granted legal indemnity to the banksters for these historical crimes. 5. Or who may use the continued perpetration of violent oppression as a just cause. 6. The vast majority wants revolutionary change to this corrupt, unjust system, in addition to having their voices heard. 7. And how judicial and executive branches interact, how legislative and executive branches interact, how communities and legislative branches interact, and how constitutionally established systems of checks and balances function. 8. There exists a deep distrust in this country between law enforcement and all poor and working class communities. This is not a race issue. This is an issue of the violent oppression of entire multiracial economic classes. The attempt to use race to divide all the people who are commonly united by the terrible impact of such an important issue is furtive behavior, indicative of the malicious intent of the economic interests who the violently repressive police and this public relations spokesperson work for. 9. Good old “shoot your unarmed child in the face while not holding accountable the people who stole from your whole country, triggering an economic depression forcing millions into terrible poverty” policing! 10. The banksters, mega corporations like Monsanto and BP and our politicians definitely need “good policing” more than poor communities. How disrespectful, absurd and insulting to our intelligence is this assertion? 11. Poor communities definitely do not have higher crime rates than the aforementioned segments who need “good policing” the most. It is a lie, it is dehumanizing to criminalize whole segments of our country’s population who are subjugated into perpetual poverty by our aristocracy, and the reference, as though this false correlation is a known fact, attempts to implant this lie into our culture’s collective conscience. That is a text book example of cultural conditioning, which is an important limb of social engineering. What is the intended result of the social engineering which aims to convince people that the poor are inherently more frequently criminal than non-poor people? I would love to hear opinions from Lex Wenberg, Omar Hajji, David Blum, Ibrahim Loeks and anyone else who is willing to be thoughtful about this situation and the mechanics of this short absurd speech. https://youtube/watch?v=4495mBrANfA&list=UU5aeU5hk31cLzq_sAExLVWg
Posted on: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:08:55 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015