What is troubling is that the loan from the Aviation Department was going to cover TIF payments the city couldn’t otherwise afford to make. In other words, Kansas City is borrowing money from the airport, with interest, to cover losses it incurred in tax abatements to things such as the Power & Light District. (Gamblers Anonymous includes this activity as one of many signs of addiction.) A $1.2 billion new terminal will upset an already out-of-balance apple cart. Consider the following: MCI is already relying on federal funds to cover losses; Federal programs aimed at subsidizing airports are drying up; The increased fees and ticket prices that are needed to fund an airport bond will make the airport less attractive to airlines and passengers; and If the airport cannot generate enough money to repay its bonds, the city will almost certainly dip into the general funds to cover the payments, just as it has done elsewhere, even when the city is not technically on the hook. Not only is building a new terminal a bad idea on its merits, but it puts at risk a source of money the city is using to cover losses on all its other bad ideas. Worse yet, a new terminal may turn the Aviation Department from a source of funds for the city to another drain on resources.
Posted on: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:49:21 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015