Whats the number? 93% of violence on Blacks is committed by Blacks? Im sure the other 7% cant all be Asians, Hispanics, Middle Eastern... Some o the Blacks HAVE TO BE also assaulted by Whites, and I cant imagine that all those Whites are gang members. So, why do Democrats and media have a selectivity on which White on Black violence to exploit for Liberal Racism? Thanks to interaction with a JUSTICE FOR MARTIN advocate, I think I have an idea. Actual White-Shoots-Black out of mutual violence (such as gangs) or simple Racism, doesnt create tension for BOTH Blacks and Whites. Only by finding Whites (or White Hispanics :D ) who shot and killed out of self-defense can Democrats get most Whites to become concerned and defensive about the White guy (or woman). Without the White response, the Democrat manipulation of Blacks becomes even more obvious. Why in the world would I racially care that Black, White, Hispanic, Asian gang members shoot each other. Who doesnt expect that? Why should I defend a Skin Head that shoots someone whos Black? Not gonna happen. But, any Neighborhood Watch volunteer of any ethnicity, or any Law Enforcement Officer of any ethnicity that shoots their assailant of any ethnicity in self-defense? I dont care about color. I care that the victim not be further victimized by Liberals. I care that Democrats treat the violent person as if the violent person is a martyr. How sad that Democrats victimize the assailants family and attack the victim of violence to create even more Racial Tension that can only benefit Democrats. Its much more sad that Grubers cant figure it out. -Strayer
Posted on: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 04:29:57 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015